Children who have brothers and sisters often have better social development than an onlychild. The government should therefore give money to parents to have two or morechildren. ’ What do you think about this proposal?

It undebatable fact that nowadays people are not eager to have nuclear families rather owning larger families containing two or more children. However, it is believed that children with their siblings are better socially developed than an only child. For this reason, that authorities ought to subsidize parents to have more children. I completely agree with both views for some reasons. Firstly, children who grow up with surrounded by their brothers and sisters are really communicative and interactive. For example, after growing up two boys, I have come up to decision that they learned how to communicate appropriately from each other. My children spent their time together and little one follows up the older brother while doing any activity. Moreover, from my own experience I can state that siblings always share the meal, which they eat with a great favor, the problem that they face with, or the new invention, which they learned. Thus, the communicativeness and the interaction of children makes them to have better social advance. Next, the government should implement some payment for having more children, which results to produce more social strong citizen. In my opinion, firstly, low-income families will be more attracted than ever before for this subsidy because financial problems may be the main reason for not having second baby. Moreover, governmental reward can be valuable for the satisfaction of second baby’s growth. I, personally have observed such kind of families who do not want to have more children because of the fear of the costs which they need the future. Hence, couples may want to have more children if their financially adequate. In conclusion, I am of the opinion that governmental implementation to produce socially developed citizen will be beneficial to low income families.