The claim that animals have rights has been subjected as a matter of debate since the 1970’s. Are zoos helping or hurting our animals? Should zoos be banned

Quite often one encounters an extensive discussion among various sections of the people in the society with respect to non human animal rights. One segment shows the inclination towards positive direction of maintaining zoos. Also, one can witness a section whose conviction can contradict with various other categories. When it comes to my stance on this topic, I would like to demonstrate my partial acceptance. I wish to describe in detail both the positive side and highlight the adverse stream regarding existence of zoos. Firstly, when I think of the brighter aspects with regards to managing Zoos, many advantages flash in. One of the few benefits that could be reiterated from juncture is that facilitating wild life education to the society. The way a person experiences the benefits requires recapitulation. A perfect illustration to support the aforementioned trend is a recent survey conducted by the University of California reveals that approximately sixty percent of the Nations world wide preferred to follow this trend. The world offers myriad instances validating the authenticity of these merits in the back drop of this topic. These positive aspects are not confined to one set of people, regardless of age or place, one can immensely get hold of all possible gains. In the next place, the drawbacks can be inevitably perceived. Though what has to be brought on to this planet could be advantageous. One can inescapably observe the completely different shade and this topic is not an exemption. The one that requires reference could be the debate on non human animal rights. In view of the argument outlined above and based on the aforementioned trend, one can conclude that the effects of the topic are indeed too great to ignore