Some people think that national sports teams and individual men and women who represent their country should be financially supported by the government. However, others argue that they should be funded by non-government sources (e.g. Business, scholarships, etc.). Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Certain individuals assume that every country should provide monetary aid to each separate sportmen and sportswomen and sports clubs such as footbal, basketball and volleyball who participate in the name of that nation, although the rest assert that private organizations ought to subsidy them. In my opinion, it must be the government who should finance athletes. There are several reasons that non government organizations should be sponsored for athletes. First and foremost, the government does not possess enough budget for everything to run in the country. Priorities for the government spending in the economy must be towards creating new workplaces, improving health sector and boost the overall well being of its population. The additional money can be directed towards other different fields to develop. For example, in England nearly all of the football clubs are sponsored by private companies. Despite the above arguments I tend to believe that nations ought to finance its national sports teams. İnitially granted, the success of crew/representatives bring fame to the country, thus country is the only available source and capable of investing high amount of money. Another key striking point is that patriotism must be instilled to sportsmen and sportwomen to passionately represent their nationality in the international arena. Consequently, the magnificent results will be gained in return of nation support. To put it in a nutshell, in spite of the fact that non government supports could have benefits, I am inclined to consider the advantages of government financing outnumber in the end.