Considerations while purchasing a bike
Considerations while purchasing a bike X8bOg
If I had to buy a bike from a dealership, then I would have to take a lot of things into consideration. First of all, the reputation of the source matters the most. I would first check which dealership has been rated the best in the market. Second of all, the vested interest of the source should be taken into consideration. Vested interest refers to the benefit that the source is supposed to get from helping me to take decisions. In other words, it is the cut or compensation for the source for taking their help to make a decision. Suppose, if I had to start investing or take advice to start something like a business let's say, then I would rather listen to Sandeep Maheswari than Tai Lopez. Do you know why? it's because credibility has to do with the vested interest. The more vested interest is, the less credible the source would be. Sandeep Maheswari has zero vested interest so he is more credible to take advice from. On the other hand, we have Tai Lopez who has a big amount of vested interest in giving us hand. Therefore, Tai Lopez is not a credible source to take advice from. Similarly, I would check the vested interest of the source which in this case would be a dealer of the vehicle dealership, I would pay attention to whether the dealer is really trying to help me or just trying to make his pocket warm.
The expertise of the source has to be taken into account as well. If the dealer or let's say my friend does not know anything about the features of the bike, then they would not be a good source to take advice from. For example, if they are not sure which bike should I ride according to my interest, about the mileage, horsepower, which technology the engine is based on, or how eco-friendly the bike is, how heavy it is to ride, how comfortable the seats or suspensions are, how good the braking system is, and so on, then I would not buy the bike. In contrast, they explain the features of the bike or everything that I ask eloquently and descriptively then I could trust them. Furthermore, the nature of the claim is another thing that I have to take into consideration. If they make a descriptive claim about the bike and simply let me decide then it would be helpful. However, if they make normative, subjective, or biased claims then that would not be much harder for me to decide. Finally, how credible reasons the dealer, my friend, or the advisor provides to me take a specific decision would matter in the case. Apart from this, I would first be well-informed regarding the features and price of motorbikes before going to the dealer so I could judge how credible advice those sources can present. More or fewer things can be taken into account depending on the necessity of the case.
If I had to
buy
a
bike
from a dealership, then I would
have to
take
a lot of
things into consideration.
First of all
, the reputation of the
source
matters the most. I would
first
check
which dealership has
been rated
the best in the market. Second of all, the vested
interest
of the
source
should
be taken
into consideration. Vested
interest
refers to the benefit that the
source
is supposed
to
get
from helping me to take decisions.
In other words
, it is the
cut
or compensation for the
source
for taking their
help
to
make
a decision. Suppose, if I had to
start
investing or take
advice
to
start
something like a business
let
's say, then I would
rather
listen to Sandeep
Maheswari
than Tai Lopez. Do you know why?
it
's
because
credibility
has to
do with the vested
interest
. The more vested
interest
is, the less
credible
the
source
would be. Sandeep
Maheswari
has zero vested
interest
so
he is more
credible
to take
advice
from.
On the other hand
, we have Tai Lopez who has a
big
amount of vested
interest
in giving us hand.
Therefore
, Tai Lopez is not a
credible
source
to take
advice
from.
Similarly
, I would
check
the vested
interest
of the
source
which
in this case
would be a
dealer
of the vehicle dealership, I would pay attention to whether the
dealer
is
really
trying to
help
me or
just
trying to
make
his pocket warm.
The expertise of the
source
has to
be taken
into account
as well
. If the
dealer
or
let
's say my friend does not know anything about the features of the
bike
, then they would not be a
good
source
to take
advice
from.
For example
, if they are not sure which
bike
should I ride according to my
interest
, about the mileage, horsepower, which technology the engine
is based
on, or how eco-friendly the
bike
is, how heavy it is to ride, how comfortable the seats or suspensions are, how
good
the braking system is, and
so
on, then I would not
buy
the
bike
.
In contrast
, they
explain
the features of the
bike
or everything that I ask
eloquently
and
descriptively
then I could trust them.
Furthermore
, the nature of the claim is another thing that I
have to
take into consideration. If they
make
a descriptive claim about the
bike
and
simply
let
me decide then it would be helpful.
However
, if they
make
normative, subjective, or biased claims then that would not be much harder for me to decide.
Finally
, how
credible
reasons the
dealer
, my friend, or the advisor provides to me take a specific decision would matter in the case. Apart from this, I would
first
be well-informed regarding the features and price of motorbikes
before
going to the
dealer
so
I could judge how
credible
advice
those
sources
can present. More or fewer things can
be taken
into account depending on the necessity of the case.
Do not write below this line