Air traffic is increasingly leading to more noise, pollution and airport construction. One reason for this is the growth in low-cost passenger flights, often to holiday destinations. Some people might say that governments should try to reduce air traffic by taxing it more heavily

It is acknowledged that air traffic, whose consequences are noise, pollution and airport construction, poses a threat to the environment. However, I do not advocate with the statement that in order to deal with this situation, steps should be taken to increase the tax of personnel flights. On the one hand, the service industry gains a multitude of benefits from air travel. Plane always regarded as one of the most convenience way to have a business trip including a holiday, especially to faraway places. By increasing the price, the amount of travelers from this industry can be on the threshold of being decreased owing to the fact that in no way can everyone pay for a high-priced seat on the plane. This innovation will probably lead to the lacking of tourist, which jeopardize seriously to country’s economic and the incomes of local inhabitants who earn money from tourism. Besides, if traveling by flight is degenerated, the number of another traffic will increase. For instance, citizens who cannot afford a prohibitive seat from the airplane tend to find the alternative transport which is more economic to travel such as car or ship, etc. Hence, the environment’s problem will transfer from air traffic to another types of traffic without being essentially solved. In conclusion, I believe that this solution should not be adopted due to several mentioned reasons. However, thanks to strong thriving of technology and science, I consider that the governments will competent enough to solve this situation in the future without having to tax heavily.