university students should pay full amount for their eduction because students are he only ones benefitted from the education they receive and not the society .do you agree or disagree?

MANY COUNTRIES AROUND THE WORLD HAVE WITNESSED COLOSSAL GROWTH OVER THE PAST SEVERAL YEARS AND MOMENTOUS CHANGES HAVE BEEN THE BEDROCK OF THIS ALL-AROUND PROGRESS. AN EXAGGERATION, IT CERTAINLY IS NOT, IF ONE WERE TO STATE THAT UNIVERSITY EDUCATION HAS FULLED THIS MATRIX OF PROGRESS. IN THIS CONTEXT, AN ISSUE THAT HAS BECOME A FIXTURE OF MANY DISCUSSIONS PERTAINS TO THE EXTENT TO WHICH STUDENTS SHOULD PAY FEES FOR THEIR UNIVERSITY EDUCATION. THIS ESSAY SHALL ANALYSES THE ISSUE FROM EVERY ANGLE AND ARGUE THAT UNIVERSITY EDUCATION SHOULD BE SUBSIDISED. HAVING SAID THAT, AN HONEST ANALYSIS WOULD MAKE US REALIZE THAT THE ABOVE - MENTIONED VIEWPOINT IS AN INTENSELY INSENSITIVE AND REMORSELESS APPROACH TO THE WHOLE ISSUE WHICH ONLY SHOWCASES THE INTELLECTUAL BANKRUPTCY OF OUR CURRENT EXISTENCE AND PROVIDES AN IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE OF THE EROSION OF OUR EXISTENCE. HENCE, NOT ONLY IS THIS ABOVE PERSPECTIVE FLAWED IN SUBSTANCE, BUT ALSO IMPOSSIBLE TO UPHOLD AND UNFAIR IN PRINCIPLE, MAKING IT RATHER UNTENABLE. A QUICK PERUSAL OF THE ISSUE AT HAND WOULD THROW UP A SURFEIT REASONS SUPPORTING MY PERSPECTIVE THAT UNIVERSITY EDUCATION SHOULD BE SUBSIDISED. TO BEGIN WITH, IT WOULD ENCOURAGE MORE PEOPLE TO TAKE UP UNIVERSITY EDUCATION AND FULFILL THEIR DREAMS WHICH WOULD BE A SHOT IN THE ARM FOR THE CAUSE OF SOCIAL MOBILITY AND AN EGALITARIAN SOCIETY. I ALSO FEEL THAT THE ULTIMATE BENEFICIARY OF THE WORK THAT THE GRADUATE DO IS THE SOCIETY ITSELF AS THE TECHNICAL EXPERTISE THAT THE STUDENT GAIN FROM UNIVERSITY STUDIES IS USED TO BUILD DAMS, POWER PLANTS AND ROADS-THE LIKES OF WHICH WOULD BE SELDOM CONSIDERED USELESS TO THE SOCIETY. FINALLY, IT WOULD NOT BE TOO OFF THE MARK IF I OPINED THAT IF UNIVERSITY ARE ALLOWED TO CHARGE FULL FEE FOR THE EDUCATION THEY PROVIDE, THEN WHO CAN GUARANTEE THAT THE SAME YARDSTICK WOULD NOT BE APPLIED TO SCHOOL EDUCATION TOO IN THE FUTURE, POTENTIALLY MAKING EDUCATION OUT OF REACH THE MASSES. HAVING CONSIDERED BOTH SIDES, IT SEEMS EVER SO SENSIBLE TO REGISTER MY DISAGREEMENT WITH THE STATEMENT THAT THE STUDENT SHOULD PAY FULL FEE FOR THEIR HIGHER EDUCATION. IN SPITE OF THE INTRICATE TAPESTRY OF ARGUMENT DELICATELY WOVEN IN FAVOUR OF FULL FEE PAYMENT, IT SEEMS UNCONVINCING TO MY PSYCHE ON A SUBTEXTUAL BASIS. IT IS ALSO EVIDENT THAT WHILE THE DOWNSIDES TO CHARGING FULL FEE ARE TANGIBLE, PROFOUND AND ENORMOUSLY CONSEQUENTIAL, THE BENEFITS ARE EPHEMERAL SUPERFICIAL AND BEYOND A POINT, CEASE TO BE PALPABLE IN THE LONG RUN. SUFFICE IT TO SAY THAT IT IS BEST NOT TO CHARGE FULL FEE FOT THE UNIVERSITY STUDIES.