Some people think that human needs for farmland housing and industry are more important than saving lands for endangered animals. do you agree or disagree with this point of view ? why or why not? use a specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Human needs simultaneously has increased with population. There is controversy among people about lands which some of them think that should be used for human needs whilst others firmly believe that these lands belongs to endangered animals. I agree with the former idea. This essay will enumerate the reasons and example of my opinion. Human being requires facilities and housing In spite of the negative consequences which it has. Should people not to have food or dwellings, the growth of them will face hardships. the growth doesn't mean the number but the technology as well as science which can be used to solve the issues. Despite the fact that mankind reached the Apex of number and their needs for residential areas and places, not only they provide conservation areas for animals which are at the risk of extinction but also They have found planets which are perfect for living. scientists state that some kinds of ways have been found to transport human and animals on those planets. Thus people don't need to tackle the results of their actions towards Earth such as global warming and shortage of land. The main conclusion to be drawn from this essay is that preservation of dense vegetation and forests also optimizing the usage of places are still controversial topic Though everyone are informed about the drawbacks of activities which are done by people, they are still destroying the lands moreover they have gotten caught in this vicious cycle. I firmly believe that we have no longer alternative choice than waiting for technology and science to change our habitat.