Some modern artists receive huge sums of money for the things they create, while others struggle to survive. Governments should take steps to resolve this unfair situation. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There are conflicts about how the government can support artists equally. It was reported that some artists obtain a massive amount of money for their artwork, whereas others cannot be known and live a hard life still. I cannot entirely agree with the statement that the government should pay the same. First, it's not deniable that art is unique, and each artist has their own abilities that ordinary people do not have. When it comes to their reputation, I personally believe that successful artists have been working hard, though they suffer from failure again and again. They use their talent and hard work to create each incredible masterpiece that is eventually appreciated by others. For example, Van Gogh and Monet's paintings attracted the attention of merchants from all over the world, and this was ultimately based on their talent. So, their success related to themselves instead of the government. On the other hand, we can regard arts the same as other occupations. In other jobs, various people gain a different amount of salaries, so as an art. In contrast, it is not hard to imagine that if everyone in society did the same job and earned the same salary, there would be many problems that occur as well. Some people may stop striking because they know that they can get the same amount of salary as the masters who devote their life in art through government subsidies. So, if the government helps those poor artists, people will stop innovating and have no motivation. In conclusion, I think that artists are famous because they put in the same amount of effort. Furthermore, there's nothing wrong with supporting some talented but undiscovered artists. However, the government should not make all artists' salaries the same.