Should buildings be replaced by parks

In the contemporary time, individuals are arguing whether or not parks should be replaced by apartment buildings in order to lessen the time spent in commuting to work. During this essay, I will contemplate the perspectives from both sides of the controversy. In point of fact, it’s crystal clear that swapping apartment buildings with parks brings a humongous amount of benefits. Initially, public parks bring a safe and lively atmosphere for children. Instead of spending all of the time on phones, adolescents can now amuse themselves at the parks and also get to make new friends. Secondly, it’s an ideal place to hold social activities. Individuals can now get to know more about residents who also live in their own neighborhood At the same time, some people tend to hold a firm belief that constructing apartment buildings also brings benefits to them. To start with, building apartment buildings near the city center intensely reduce the amount of time commuting to work. In our contemporary world, it’s not rare to see people have a complex time dealing with traffic jams. With the appearance of apartment buildings, this problem is crucially solved. Furthermore, pollution can also be solved with the help of these high-rise buildings. Nevertheless, Individuals who find it hard commuting to shopping malls can now pay reasonable prices to live in these buildings which also brings benefits to themselves. In conclusion, doing this may brings discomfort to certain individuals although building apartments can also brings benefits to those who are in need. All residents should express their opinions to sharply solve this problem.