check writing band score for a text that I have copied from a book.

When I first visited Google’s sprawling corporate headquarters in 2012, I felt like a kid entering Willy Wonka’s chocolate factory. The company’s campus in Mountain View, California, boasts state-of-the-art everything, with a bit of whimsy on top. As I wound my way between office buildings, I encountered beach volleyball courts, fanciful sculptures, a gift shop stocked with branded tchotchkes, and free world-class restaurants. It was stunning. Google had invited me and a group of other academics to its headquarters to attend a retreat for its senior human resources directors, but I couldn’t help wondering what this company—one of the world’s most innovative and successful—could possibly need from us. The smiling employees whizzing by on bikes painted in the primary colours of their company’s logo certainly didn’t look like they had any problems. Google had raked in 38 billion dollars in revenue the year before my visit. But everyone has problems—even Google. The company had convened the retreat to find new ways to help its employees make better decisions both at work and at home, with a particular emphasis on improving their productivity as well as their health and financial security (both of which have been linked to improved work performance). Midway through the event, Prasad Setty, a Wharton alum and Google vice president who had been in human resources for several years, asked me a seemingly innocuous question that would set me on the path to one of my most significant discoveries. Google, he explained, offered its employees a wide range of benefits and programs designed to make their lives and jobs better and to solve such problems as undersaving for retirement, overuse of social media, physical inactivity, unhealthy eating, and smoking. But oddly enough, these programs weren’t widely used. Prasad was both puzzled and frustrated that so many programs his team had created (which Google paid dearly for) went largely ignored. Why weren’t employees clamoring to take advantage of free skill-building classes? Why weren’t they all signing up for the company’s 401(k) match and personal trainers? Prasad had considered a few possible explanations, all of them plausible enough. Maybe the programs were being poorly advertised. Or maybe employees were just too busy to take advantage of them. But he also wondered about timing. Did I know, he asked when Google should encourage employees to take advantage of these resources? Was there some ideal moment on the calendar or in someone’s career to encourage b change? I paused. Prasad’s question was clearly important, and yet, to my knowledge, academics had largely overlooked it. If we hoped to effectively promote behaviour change, of course, we would need to understand when to begin. Although I didn’t have an easy answer for Prasad, I did have a hunch. I told him that before I could offer a reply grounded in solid evidence, I would need to review the academic literature and gather some data of my own. I started itching to get back to my research team in Philadelphia.