Remove parks and farmlands by houses is negative or positive

It is true that there is rapid increase in population and therefore enormous increase in need for the housing and other facilities. Developing new towns is a better idea to manage the increased population needs. With the new towns there comes the well planned infrastructures and facilities to meet the needs of increased population. Moreover, the health care and education systems can also be properly developed to cater the population. Furthermore, the traffic congestion problems can also be easily managed with the establishment of new towns. There is no doubt that new towns attract people who prefer to spend there life in good and pollution free environments. Existing cities wouldn't get overcrowded when new places are developed eventually the restructuring of the existing towns and cities can de avoided. Otherwise the restructuring may cause the destruction of the trees and utilization of parks and recreational areas to expand the existing towns and cities. However, the development of cities involves huge budget allocation and requires the good portion of state funds to be invested on the projects. In addition, it may take several years to really develop the infrastructures of the new towns. Moreover, people who work in cities frequently need to travel to cities which in turn adds up to the traffic congestion which makes the new towns rather unattractive for the population to relocate. In summary, I would concede that the advantages of developing new towns far outweigh the disadvantages involved. There would be always a need and demand for new towns to keep the environment as well as existing cities and towns preserved.