Question 4: Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Question 4: Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the human population. with this opinion? DLGO6
The importance of the protection of wildlife has always been a topic of controversy. While some people convince that wild animals’ conservation is a waste of money and time, I totally disagree with this opinion and believe that it is beneficial to maintain a healthy wildlife population.
It is acknowledged that the extinction of wildlife animals is a burning issue. Due to the rapid overpopulation in recent years, natural resources are being consumed faster to serve human needs. Consequently, the habitats and food sources of various types of animals all over the world are endangered, leading to the aggravating extinction of numerous animal groups. If the ignorance towards this problem continues, it will result in the loss of every single animal species and since the ecosystem loses its balance, every aspect of life will be affected such as income, livelihoods, local migration, or political situations. For that reason, the state budget has to be allocated to protect biodiversity and our ecosystem.
Moreover, I deem that protecting fauna brings substantial benefits to our development. Firstly, wildlife conservation promotes agricultural biodiversity, which has a greater part to play in building a secure, robust, and thriving food system. For example, the locusts' invasion that swept over farms in rural Kenya left farmers only counting crop losses and similar problems can not be solved if their natural predators are extinct. Secondly, increasing healthy ecosystems through conservation improves agricultural productivity thereby stimulating rural livelihoods. Furthermore, diverse ecosystems which are home to unique species can become local tourist attractions, which helps the local economy become more profitable and invites a new fusion of investment.
In conclusion, I would argue that wildlife conservation is a worthy cause for the benefits that such scheme can bring about.
The importance of the protection of
wildlife
has always been a topic of controversy. While
some
people
convince that wild
animals’
conservation
is a waste of money and time, I
totally
disagree with this opinion and believe that it is beneficial to maintain a healthy
wildlife
population.
It
is acknowledged
that the extinction of
wildlife
animals
is a burning issue. Due to the rapid overpopulation in recent years, natural resources are
being consumed
faster to serve human needs.
Consequently
, the habitats and food sources of various types of
animals
all over the world
are endangered
, leading to the aggravating extinction of numerous
animal
groups. If the ignorance towards this problem continues, it will result in the loss of every single
animal
species and since the ecosystem loses its balance, every aspect of life will be
affected
such as income, livelihoods, local migration, or political situations. For that reason, the state budget
has to
be allocated
to protect biodiversity and our ecosystem.
Moreover
, I deem that protecting fauna brings substantial benefits to our development.
Firstly
,
wildlife
conservation
promotes agricultural biodiversity, which has a greater part to play in building a secure, robust, and thriving food system.
For example
, the locusts' invasion that swept over farms in rural Kenya
left
farmers
only
counting crop losses and similar problems can not
be solved
if their natural predators are extinct.
Secondly
, increasing healthy ecosystems through
conservation
improves
agricultural productivity thereby stimulating rural livelihoods.
Furthermore
, diverse ecosystems which are home to unique species can become local tourist attractions, which
helps
the local economy become more profitable and invites a new fusion of investment.
In conclusion
, I would argue that
wildlife
conservation
is a worthy cause for the benefits that such scheme can bring about.
Do not write below this line