In light of the current socio-economic situation of the world, do you think this the right time for wild life preservation? If yes, what are the ways and means you suggest for this?
In light of the current socio-economic situation of the world, do you think this the right time for wild life preservation? If yes, what are the ways and means you suggest for this? 3gAmN
The present day is the age of contradictions of opinions, inventions, and actions. As if
to exemplify, the civilized man pampers the wilderness while devouring it. But this
paradox is practically inevitable since we exploit the wild for sustenance and, hence, we
must sustain it for our continued future. So, regardless of economics or societal factors,
wild life must be preserved at any and all times. We must conserve, and cohabit with,
the wild which, in fact, will preserve it in the long run.
It is true that for us to survive we must exploit the environment and all life in it. So
preservationist campaigns that suggest leaving the wilderness alone or becoming a part
of it has not been so popular and viable. A wiser approach is conservation, using the
God sent resources sparingly like fiscal savings. Being wasteful, in any facet of life, is
reproachable, and same goes for wild life. If we exploit nature only so economically that
we obtain our nourishment while keeping her so sound that she continues bearing fruit,
we will be best off, as not only us, but also generations to come will have sustained this
way. Being wasteful and destructive will only usurp the natural resources
catastrophically faster which may cause the untimely demise of all humans.
Also, if we keep the spirit of harmony and learn to cohabit with wild life, all may live.
This planet is in fact big enough for sustaining all life. So, being destructive to that
which does not fight back is foolish, especially when the non-aggressor is our sole
source.
To conclude, here, we should never be scrutinizing whether it is the right time for
preserving wild life because any time is a good time, and, practically, the only time, for
guaranteeing that nature sustains so that she withholds us and others with nurturing care.
The present day is the age of contradictions of opinions, inventions, and actions. As if
to exemplify, the civilized
man
pampers the wilderness while devouring it.
But
this
paradox is
practically
inevitable since we exploit the wild for sustenance and,
hence
, we
must
sustain it for our continued future.
So
, regardless of economics or societal factors,
wild
life
must
be preserved
at any and all
times
. We
must
conserve, and cohabit with,
the wild which, in fact, will preserve it in the long run.
It is true that for us to survive we
must
exploit the environment and all
life
in it.
So
preservationist campaigns that suggest leaving the wilderness alone or becoming a part
of it has not been
so
popular and viable. A wiser approach is conservation, using the
God
sent
resources
sparingly
like fiscal savings. Being wasteful, in any facet of
life
, is
reproachable, and same goes for wild
life
. If we exploit nature
only
so
economically
that
we obtain our nourishment while keeping her
so
sound that she continues bearing fruit,
we will be best off, as not
only
us,
but
also
generations to
come
will have sustained this
way. Being wasteful and destructive will
only
usurp the natural resources
catastrophically
faster which may cause the
untimely
demise of all humans.
Also
, if we
keep
the spirit of harmony and learn to cohabit with wild
life
, all may
live
.
This planet is in fact
big
enough
for sustaining all
life
.
So
, being destructive to that
which does not fight back is foolish,
especially
when the non-aggressor is our sole
source.
To conclude
, here, we should never be scrutinizing whether it is the right
time
for
preserving wild
life
because
any
time
is a
good
time
, and,
practically
, the
only
time
, for
guaranteeing that nature sustains
so
that she withholds us
and others
with nurturing care.
Do not write below this line