Check your IELTS writing task 1 and essay, this is a free correction and evaluation service.

IELTS Writing Answer Sheet

Candidate Name:

Kaur Navjot

Center Number:

Candidate Number:

Module (shade one box):

Academic:

General Training:

Test Date:

Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. nq01R

Some people argue that it is pointless to spend money on the protection of wild animals because we humans have no need for them. I completely disagree with this point of view. In my opinion, it is absurd to argue that wild animals have no place in the 21st century. I do not believe that planet Earth exists only for the benefit of humans, and there is nothing special about this particular century that means that we suddenly have the right to allow or encourage the extinction of any species. Furthermore, there is no compelling reason why we should let animals die out. We do not need to exploit or destroy every last square metre of land in order to feed or accommodate the world’s population. There is plenty of room for us to exist side by side with wild animals, and this should be our aim. I also disagree with the idea that protecting animals is a waste of resources. It is usually the protection of natural habitats that ensures the survival of wild animals, and most scientists agree that these habitats are also crucial for human survival. For example, rainforests produce oxygen, absorb carbon dioxide and stabilise the Earth’s climate. If we destroyed these areas, the costs of managing the resulting changes to our planet would far outweigh the costs of conservation. By protecting wild animals and their habitats, we maintain the natural balance of all life on Earth. In conclusion, we have no right to decide whether or not wild animals should exist, and I believe that we should do everything we can to protect them.

Some
people
 argue that it is pointless to spend money on the protection of wild animals
because
 we humans have no need for them. I completely disagree with this point of view.

In my opinion, it is absurd to argue that wild animals
 have no place in the 21st century. I do not believe that planet Earth exists only
 for the benefit of humans, and there is nothing special about this particular century that means that we suddenly
 have the right to allow
 or encourage the extinction of any species. Furthermore
, there is no compelling reason why we should let
animals
die
 out. We do not need to exploit or destroy
 every last square metre
 of land in order to feed or accommodate the world’s population. There is plenty
 of room for us to exist side by side with wild animals
, and this should be our aim.

I also
 disagree with the idea
 that protecting animals
 is a waste of resources. It is usually
 the protection of natural habitats that ensures the survival of wild animals
, and most scientists agree
 that these habitats are also
 crucial for human survival. For example
, rainforests produce oxygen, absorb carbon dioxide and stabilise
 the Earth’s climate. If we destroyed
 these areas, the costs of managing the resulting changes
 to our planet would far outweigh the costs of conservation. By protecting wild animals
 and their habitats, we maintain the natural balance of all life on Earth.

In conclusion
, we have no right to decide whether or not
 wild animals
 should exist, and I believe that we should do everything we can to protect them. 

Do not write below this line

Official use only

6.5

5.5

6.0

OVERALL BAND SCORE

6.0

IELTS essay Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources.

👍 High Quality Evaluation	Correction made by newly developed AI
✅ Check your Writing	Paste/write text, get result
⭐ Writing Ideas	Free for everyone
⚡ Comprehensive report	Analysis of your text
⌛ Instant feedback	Get report in less than a second

Copy promo code:Gokz2

Copy