Too much emphasis is placed on testing these days. The need to prepare for tests and examinations is a restriction on teachers and also exerts unnecessary pressure on young learners. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective? Provide reasons for your answer. Include relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

It is argued that the test-mode examination, is not the better method to evaluate students at schools, and it also leads to stress and anxiety either for teachers or students. I agree with the statement while I think there must more efficient ways to examine students. There are instrumental reasons that involve in this phenomenon which this essay is going to address in the subsequent paragraphs. It is oftenly suggested that the assesment means at schools should be restricter to bring up well educated adolescents, and prepare them for further education. The system of schools at any range should coordinate with updated techniques in order to assist students in their course regardless of tests and scoring, so due to the fact that the competent learners can thrive more with encouraging. The teachers who have a big part in teenagers school life should enjoy from teaching and they would achieve this with culminating students talents not with spending time on long tests. For facilitating students evaluation at schools, without pushing them and injecting stress to their minds, there are lots of loopholes suggested at today’s world; for instance, micro exams would be the best way to estimate students abilities and weaknesses and prevent the accumulation of lessons for the end of the semester. This method could assist teachers to address their students vacancies and fill them astutely. In conclusion, schools should have specials schemes based on dynamic methods and encouraging for students curriculum, it can also help educators to obtain stress-free teaching period.