Some young people commit serious crimes, such as robbery or violent attacks. Some people think they should be punished in the same way as adults. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some young people commit serious crimes, such as robbery or violent attacks. Some people think they should be punished in the same way as adults. VolOA
Whether minor criminals deserve the same punishment as adult convicts have been
in the spotlight all over the world. However, this essay will prove that people should
stop wavering between punishing these young criminals less seriously and imposing
the same treatment to them, while discussing minor outlaws over 14 or 15 years old
who violate laws severely. Namely, the existence of different treatments between
adult culprits and young offenders in this case does not make any sense.
Primarily, objectors assert that these young criminals might be instigated by others
to commit crimes, and their subjectivity of breaking laws is relatively limited.
Seemingly, they break the law unwillingly and involuntarily. In fact, most felonies are
committed premeditatedly with well-organized plans, and even schoolchildren can
easily estimate severe outcomes of these serious crimes with the common sense they
got from school and their parents. An instance in point is that there is no convincing
evidence to show that minor criminals who robbed a supermarket with guns have
less willingness to do so than an adult who does the same thing.
Additionally, another standpoint these objectors hold is chances are that young
culprits can be more easily remoulded. Nevertheless, the truth is that due to the
serious crimes those young culprits took part in, they are all sentenced to at least 8
or 10 years in prison. After serving their sentence in juvenile detention for 3 or 4
years, they of course would be transferred to ordinary jails because they become
adults. Thereafter, their new cell mates might tell them that how they felt when they
killed people they did not like. And the prisoner who they are weeding with could
help them analyze why they need a shotgun for robbing a bank rather than a rifle.
People could imagine what would happen if those young people return to our
society after a few years.
Forgiveness for wrong people is punishment for upright citizens, and consequently
young people with unforgivable behaviors ought to be imposed the same treatment
as adults to let them know what the crime cost is.
Whether minor
criminals
deserve the same punishment as adult convicts have been
in
the spotlight all over the world.
However
, this essay will prove that
people
should
stop
wavering between punishing these
young
criminals
less
seriously
and imposing
the same treatment to them, while discussing minor outlaws over 14 or 15 years
old
who
violate laws
severely
.
Namely
, the existence of
different
treatments between
adult
culprits and
young
offenders
in this case
does not
make
any sense.
Primarily
, objectors assert that these
young
criminals
might
be instigated
by others
to
commit
crimes
, and their subjectivity of breaking laws is
relatively
limited.
Seemingly
, they break the law
unwillingly
and
involuntarily
. In fact, most felonies
are
committed
premeditatedly
with well-organized plans, and even schoolchildren can
easily
estimate severe outcomes of these serious
crimes
with the common sense they
got
from school and their parents. An instance in point is that there is no
convincing
evidence to
show
that minor
criminals
who robbed a supermarket with guns have
less
willingness to do
so
than an adult who does the same thing.
Additionally
, another standpoint these objectors hold is chances are that young
culprits
can be more
easily
remoulded
.
Nevertheless
, the truth is that due to the
serious
crimes
those
young
culprits
took part
in, they are all sentenced to at least 8
or
10 years in prison. After serving their sentence in juvenile detention for 3 or 4
years, they
of course
would
be transferred
to ordinary jails
because
they become
adults
. Thereafter, their new cell mates might
tell
them that how they felt when they
killed
people
they did not like. And the prisoner who they are weeding with
could
help
them analyze why they need a shotgun for robbing a bank
rather
than a rifle.
People
could imagine what would happen if those
young
people
return to our
society
after a few years.
Forgiveness for
wrong
people
is
punishment for upright citizens, and
consequently
young
people
with unforgivable behaviors ought to
be imposed
the same treatment
as
adults to
let
them know what the
crime
cost is.
Do not write below this line