Super markets should be increased or not
Super markets should be increased or not E0pLq
Around the world, big business firms are investing more in supermarkets, as a result, we can see there is significant growth in supermarket chains, which this led to a negative impact on local businesses and also led to the death of local communities. I strongly agree with this statement, the governments should limit these businesses and should focus on the development of local markets.
Supermarkets have seen significant growth compared to local businesses over the last decade, as a result, we can see decrement in local businesses, and this is not only affecting local vendors but also consumers. For example, people who want to buy daily essentials can't visit the supermarket, the reasons can be, taxes on purchases or higher prices, if he doesn't have an option such as local vendors, they choose supermarkets.
On the other hand, supermarkets' monopolies will be increased, if they are sole players in these markets, so the government should limit their monopoly and should give a boost to the development of the local markets, therefore equilibrium is well maintained. For an instance we can see that prices of certain products are high compared to local shops, people who have no option rather than these hypermarkets will pay a higher amount from their pockets, hence monopoly should be curtailed by the government, and should focus on the price of the products.
I conclude that first, the government should be more focused on the development of the local businesses rather than the closure of it. And addition to this it should bring stability in prices and should decide the price of a particular product and a fine should be imposed for selling it for higher prices.
Around the world,
big
business
firms are investing more in supermarkets,
as a result
, we can
see
there is significant growth in supermarket chains, which this led to a
negative
impact on
local
businesses
and
also
led to the death of
local
communities. I
strongly
agree
with this statement, the
governments
should limit these
businesses
and should focus on the development of
local
markets.
Supermarkets have
seen
significant growth compared to
local
businesses
over the last decade,
as a result
, we can
see
decrement in
local
businesses
, and this is not
only
affecting
local
vendors
but
also
consumers.
For example
,
people
who want to
buy
daily essentials can't visit the supermarket, the reasons can be, taxes on
purchases
or higher
prices
, if he doesn't have an option such as
local
vendors, they choose supermarkets.
On the other hand
, supermarkets' monopolies will
be increased
, if they are sole players in these markets,
so
the
government
should limit their monopoly and should give a boost to the development of the
local
markets,
therefore
equilibrium is well maintained. For an instance we can
see
that
prices
of certain products are high compared to
local
shops,
people
who have no option
rather
than these hypermarkets will pay a higher amount from their pockets,
hence
monopoly should
be curtailed
by the
government
, and should focus on the
price
of the products.
I conclude that
first
, the
government
should be more focused on the development of the
local
businesses
rather
than the closure of it. And addition to this it should bring stability in
prices
and should decide the
price
of a particular product and a fine should
be imposed
for selling it for higher
prices
.
Do not write below this line