Some people think that governments should spend more money on sports facilities for top athletes.Others argue that this money should be spent for sports facilities for ordinary people. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.

Nowadays, some people say that governments should spend money in supporting odinary people doing sports. In contrast, others believe that governments should focus on talent sports-people to win important international competions. In my opinion, both views have its own ways of spending governments budget. On one hand, I agree that spending money in improving sport facilities for odinary people brings many benefits. Firstly, people have many opportunities to do more exercises. For example, governments should build more football and basketball fields for citizens. An other advantage for people is that doing sports makes them more healthy and can help them to avoid bad diseases such as abesity, high blood pressure and heart attack. One of the most important benefit for young people is that they can learn how to lose as well as how to win, to teamwork with others when they play sport. In addition, they can make friend with many other ones. On the other hand, I believe that governments invest money in training talent sports-people has as many advantages as that they pay for sport equipments for the general population. If top athletes can win in an international competion, it can make their country become well-known all over the world, and give their country a sense of pride. For example, in Seagame 26 in Indonesia, a swimmer, named Hoang Quy Phuoc, got an Olympic record, and Vietnamese were very proud of him. An other good point is that these athletes can be good role models for young people. For instant, there are many famos football professor are young people’s idols like Ronaldo and Ronaldinho. In conclusion, I believe that governments should invest money in both general population and top athletes, because they can, in turn, bring back many benefits for people and country.