some people think governments should spend as much money as possible exploring outer space (for example, travelling to the Moon and to other planets). However, others disagree and think governments should spend this money on our basis needs on Earth. Discuss both these views, and give your own opinion.

In this day and age, space exploration has increased remarkably, leading to a great deal of controversy. This essay attempts to outline both the merit and demerits of space research before presenting my final conclusion. Day by day, exploration of the universe becomes more developing than its in the past. This requires the governments to devote money to equipment, manpower, and modern technique. Spending money on outer space exploration, the authorities will give their hand to the researchers to discover many new planets. By doing so, humans will have different places where social are able to multiply when the Earth faces up with disaster and death. An additional merit of the cosmos that can be highlighted is prove to the level of economic development. Researching on extraterrestrial life is only performed in the country that is developed and residents have happiness life. When it comes to the other side, some individuals think policy makers ought to invest money in fundamental needs. In general, almost countries are developing but not rich. Making heavy investment in immediate needs is necessary thing to do because these countries have to improve national life and education. These are the first step which many countries can reach to the rich nation in the world. In conclusion, I prefer spend much money on necessities of life than outer space exploration. However, in my opinion, the authorities need to balance these two things in order to not only enhance national life but also highlight the country in the whole world