Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end world poverty and hunger. Others say that economic growth is causing damage to the environment, and should be stopped now. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Economic development is obviously one of the top priorities of any government across the globe. While some individuals believe this growth has a seriously harmful impact on the environment, some people advocate that this development is the only solution to stop poormess poverty shortage and starvation. On the one hand, there are two main reasons why it is claimed that the environment is negatively affected by the economic growth. Firstly, when a country focuses on growing its economy, there are definitely more factories and plants are built in that country. It necessitates the combustion of fossil fuels which releases an excessive amount of carbon dioxide into the environment. Inadditionally, factories' discharge of effluents contaminated water sources. For instance, the waste-water emission sewage disposal of a foreign company located in Dong Nai province of Viet Nam in recent years has resulted in the mass death of fish in Dong Nai river. On the other hand, I claim that the deveploment of economic. Firstly, a wealthy economy creates more job opportunities that allow each citizen to easily seek for stable careers and have a decent income. Moreover, the government can provide funding to the poor and the people who are homeless if there is a huge economic growth in the state. These people can afford their basic living expenses with the money given from the country. Besides, the steadily economic growth also can give the poor children free chance to receive education, which may make them obtain good salary when they grow up and escape from the poverty. Compared to economic growth, the technology development can also prevent poverty and hunger from happening or arising. For example, the production of crops will increase if scientists obtain huge innovation on some machines which are benefit to the agriculture. From these three points, economic growth can not only end the poverty and famine, but also can generate a good cycle in the society. In conclusion, I would reaffirm that although the rapid development of economy may have an adverse influence on the Earth, I believe this growth effectively helps to increase the nation's growth and tackle the problem of impoverishment.