Shops should not be allowed to sell food and drinks tha are scientifically proven to be bad for people's health. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Shops should not be allowed to sell food and drinks tha are scientifically proven to be bad for people's health. NKMb0
The 21st century has witnessed a general thought that governments should forbid stores from selling food and libration which have been verified to be detrimental to citizens’ health, with which I completely disagree. This essay will elaborate on the reasons for my perspective.
To commence with, it is conceivable that providing policies banning shops from putting sustenance with potentially detrimental ingredients on sale may negatively influence companies. In other words, with the unprecedented increase in types of food, these corporations are making profits from manufacturing low-nutrition refreshments for the citizens, especially youngsters. For instance, the revenues gained from introducing snacks of Oishi organization have been estimated to be about 1 billion USD per year, taking place 90% of their total income. This means that without the benefits of producing inadequate diets for individuals, companies may struggle from low interest, which thus affects the national economy.
Furthermore, by preventing the production of low-nutrition victuals, citizens may be restricted of their options for purchasing food and beverages. Specifically, because of the prevention for junk food, individuals are constrained to consume less commedities; as a result, it poses a challenge for employees who do not have enough time to prepare their meals properly. A research in the US has shown that there are 55% people in the total of interviewees responding that they would rather spend their money for purchasing unhealthy products due to its convinience.
In conclusion, it must be considered that by providing rules to ban stores from trading indequate food and beverages for the citizens, not only organzations which totally depend on manufacturing these products will be affected but also individuals may suffer from less options of purchasing commedietes.
The 21st century has witnessed a general
thought
that
governments
should forbid stores from selling
food
and libration which have
been verified
to be detrimental to
citizens’
health, with which I completely disagree. This essay will elaborate on the reasons for my perspective.
To commence with, it is conceivable that providing policies banning shops from putting sustenance with
potentially
detrimental ingredients on sale may
negatively
influence
companies
.
In other words
, with the unprecedented increase in types of
food
, these corporations are making profits from manufacturing low-nutrition refreshments for the
citizens
,
especially
youngsters.
For instance
, the revenues gained from introducing snacks of Oishi organization have
been estimated
to be about 1 billion USD per year, taking place 90% of their total income. This means that without the benefits of producing inadequate diets for individuals,
companies
may struggle from low interest, which
thus
affects the national economy.
Furthermore
, by preventing the production of low-nutrition victuals,
citizens
may
be restricted
of their options for purchasing
food
and beverages.
Specifically
,
because
of the prevention for junk
food
, individuals
are constrained
to consume less commedities;
as a result
, it poses a challenge for employees who do not have
enough
time to prepare their meals
properly
. A research in the US has shown that there are 55%
people
in the total of interviewees responding that they would
rather
spend their money for purchasing unhealthy products due to its convinience.
In conclusion
, it
must
be considered
that by providing
rules
to ban stores from trading indequate
food
and beverages for the
citizens
, not
only
organzations which
totally
depend on manufacturing these products will be
affected
but
also
individuals may suffer from less options of purchasing commedietes.
Do not write below this line