Many developing countries require aid from international organisations to develop. Many people think that this aid should be financial, while others think that practical aid and advice are more useful. What is your opinion?

In this day and age, there is an urgent need for the aid of global organisations to develop the growth of many developing countries. Some people believe that this aid ought to be in the form of finance, while others think that practical aid and advices are much more beneficial. Personally, I agree with the former. Firstly, financial aid can provide abundant funds for developing countries to invest in crucial infrastructure like roads, ports, and utilities. These kinds of infrastructure are necessary for economic growth on account of the fact that they represent an essential input in any production of goods and services as well as reduce the cost of delivered goods and facilitate the physical mobility of people and products. Another point to make is that substructure can improve the quality of life in developing nations, which is a factor to raise the position of the country in the world. Secondly, monetary aid can boost the development of education, which results in dramatic national development. It is undeniable that the education system is one of the most significant factors for national growth because it lays a foundation for the sustainability of a country, especially the developing one. Should a nation want to promote education, it will have to spend a large amount of money, which can come from financial aid on it. For example, Singapore is a country that uses most of its financial support for innovating and bettering its education system, and consequently, this country, nowadays, is regarded as a high-income economy as well as a highly developed country. To sum up, although a group of people believe that practical aid and advice are more significant, I hold a firm belief that it is wiser to require financial aid.