Formal examination are the only effective way to assess a student's performance. Continual assessment such as course work and project is not a satisfactory way to do this

Over the decades education is vital role in individuals' life. Formal probes are the solely beneficial way to evaluate a student's performance or continuous assignment and project works. From my perspective, I completely disagree the former view. In the upcoming paragraphs. I will give my view on the topic discussed above. On the one hand, standarized tests best way to examine students overall knowledge. If we take a child as example, more and more people he or she take part in continuous midterm they might help more self-confidence he gains, and he can acquire knowledge of from this misunderstanding and tries not to reoccur them. And daily basis tests probe childrens compherence and can be help them understand why they made a error and to conclude their faults. And he attempts to correct those mistakes. On the other hand, if a child is suddenly taken to a standarized exam, he will sense of anxiety and forget about what he know. As a consequence, the student result will be low. For example, If he might attempts to solve similar oral before if the result is marvellous, he will answer the quiz without any fear. But on the other hand, If he passess the continual test get a best result he will definetely take a magnificent consequence in the formal exam. In conclusion, there are many ways to evalute a students performance. However, continual assessments give more accurate result than formal examination. It is therefore much more effective when it comes to assess a students overall performance.