The Perpetrators of Workplace Bullying in Schools: A South African Study
The Perpetrators of Workplace Bullying in Schools: A South African Study rDE92
Corene De Wet and Lynette Jacobs (2014)
A general concern in the workplace is not only how management manages, but also what goes
on when colleagues choose to turn their heads. Previous research has looked at such
undisclosed behaviour as sexual harassment, emotional and physical abuse, and workplace
aggression, the psychological impact of these behaviours on the individual, as well as the
organisational cost implications (Cox, 1978; Hoel, Sparks and Cooper, 2002; Turney, 2003; Einarsen, Hoel, Zapf and Cooper, 2003; Matthiesen and Einarsen, 2004; Hoel and Faragher,
2004; Penney and Spector, 2005; Steinman, n. d). Workplace bullying is a particular form of
aggression where direct or indirect acts lead an employee to being systematically subjected to
acts involving degrading and disrespectful treatment due to serious personal differences
between employees (Einarsen, Hoel and Nielsen, 2005).
There are many possible factors that could lead an individual to experience bullying within their
work environment. These pertain to organisational factors that foster bullying, perpetrator’s
personality characteristics and individual personality characteristics of the victim. Much of the
recent research has focused on the distinguishing features that define a ‘bully’, as well as trying
to determine the characteristic traits of the victim. This has led to unnecessary stereotypes
(Bowie, Fisher and Cooper, 2005), thus not every individual may perceive their negative
experiences as bullying but rather prefer to label their actions differently in order to cope.
Certain aspects of a person has been considered in order to assist researchers in determining
the characteristics that define the bully, such as an individual’s age, gender (Olafsson and
Johannsdottir, 2004) and his/her mental status (Goldman, 2006). Research indicates that a
child belonging to an aggressive family is a central indicator that the child is likely to exhibit
aggressive behaviour (Radke-Yarrow and Kochanska, 1990). As will be discussed, aggression
is a fundamental trait in a bully (Einarsen, 1999), thus 2 aggressive children are likely to be a
bully in the schoolyard playing field as well as to carry this behaviour with them through life to
become the workplace bully themselves (Smith, Singer, Hoel and Cooper, 2003; as cited in
Branch, Ramsay and Barker, 2008). Bullying at work is claimed to be an extreme form of social
stress. Bullying in the workplace is referred to as a more crippling and devastating problem for
employees than all other work-related stressors put together (Matthiesen et al. , 2004). Coping
may be seen as a moderator of the impact of the negative behaviour, thus it is necessary to
consider the coping strategies victims are likely to employ when faced with a bullying situation.
However, coping styles are person-specific, according to their social norms and may vary the
impact on the individual during the bullying process (Cox, 1978)
Corene
De
Wet and Lynette Jacobs (2014)
A general concern in the
workplace
is not
only
how management manages,
but
also
what goes
on
when colleagues choose to turn their heads. Previous research has looked at
such
undisclosed
behaviour
as sexual harassment, emotional and physical abuse, and workplace
aggression, the psychological impact of these
behaviours
on the
individual
,
as well
as the
organisational
cost implications (Cox, 1978;
Hoel
, Sparks and Cooper, 2002;
Turney
, 2003;
Einarsen
,
Hoel
,
Zapf
and Cooper, 2003;
Matthiesen
and
Einarsen
, 2004;
Hoel
and
Faragher
,
2004; Penney and Spector, 2005;
Steinman
, n. d).
Workplace
bullying
is a particular form
of
aggression where direct or indirect acts lead an employee to being
systematically
subjected to
acts involving degrading and disrespectful treatment due to serious personal differences
between
employees (
Einarsen
,
Hoel
and Nielsen, 2005).
There are
many
possible factors that could lead an
individual
to experience
bullying
within their
work
environment. These pertain to
organisational
factors that foster
bullying
, perpetrator’
s
personality
characteristics
and
individual
personality
characteristics
of the victim. Much of
the
recent research has focused on the distinguishing features that define a
‘bully’
,
as well
as trying
to
determine the
characteristic
traits of the victim. This has led to unnecessary
stereotypes
(Bowie, Fisher and Cooper, 2005),
thus
not every
individual
may perceive their
negative
experiences
as
bullying
but
rather
prefer to label their actions
differently
in order to cope.
Certain aspects of a person has
been considered
in order to assist researchers in determining
the
characteristics
that define the
bully
, such as an
individual’s
age, gender (
Olafsson
and
Johannsdottir
, 2004) and his/her mental status (Goldman, 2006). Research indicates that
a
child belonging to an aggressive family is a central indicator that the child is likely to exhibit
aggressive
behaviour
(
Radke-Yarrow
and
Kochanska
, 1990). As will
be discussed
,
aggression
is a fundamental trait in a
bully
(
Einarsen
, 1999),
thus
2 aggressive children are likely to be a
bully in the schoolyard playing field
as well
as to carry this
behaviour
with them through life to
become the
workplace
bully
themselves (Smith, Singer,
Hoel
and Cooper, 2003; as cited in
Branch, Ramsay and Barker, 2008).
Bullying
at work
is claimed
to be an extreme form of
social
stress
.
Bullying
in the
workplace
is referred
to as a more crippling and devastating problem
for
employees
than all other work-related stressors put together (
Matthiesen
et al.
,
2004). Coping
may be
seen
as a moderator of the impact of the
negative
behaviour
,
thus
it is necessary to
consider
the coping strategies victims are likely to employ when faced with a
bullying
situation.
However
, coping styles are person-specific, according to their social norms and may vary the
impact on the
individual
during the
bullying
process (Cox, 1978)
Do not write below this line