The media should limit how much bad news they report because it discourages people from doing activities which usually involve very little risk. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

These days, with the development of our life, the word “media” becomes more and more familiar with people because it is a normal demand to help everyone keep up with the latest information in the world. As a result, it emerged in the daily life of each individual. However, I believe that each source of news should be considered carefully before announcing to people to minimize the effects of some terrible news to viewers. There is no doubt that the coverage of the latest news is very fast, it can reach to everyone by an easy way and this is the reason why some people argue that the media should not report so much bad news. To be more specific, if a country is well-known for its beauty. people will choose this place to be a destination for their holiday. Unluckily, at the same time, there is a channel on Youtube that posts a video and talks about the rate of crime in this country without any evidence, it may prevent tourists from visiting this country and this is a simple example of the effect of bad news to them. As a result, most people feel pessimistic about their surroundings. On the other hand, notification of bad news also plays a vital role in our lives. It supports citizens who are able to protect themselves to avoid the risk based on the notification as well as improving the awareness of severe issues which need to be addressed. In conclusion, although limiting the bad news is necessary, people also need to know what happened in their usual life. Hence, it is essential for informing audiences about useful information and not being sensational, shocking or unpleasant because it helps the community unanimously handle these problems and will not discourage people from doing activities which usually involve very little risk.