Check your IELTS writing task 1 and essay, this is a free correction and evaluation service.
Check IELTS Writing it's free
British CouncilIDPCambridge
IELTS Writing Answer Sheet
Barcode 3
Candidate Name:
aew awe
Center Number:
1
2
3
4
   
Candidate Number:
2
3
7
5
1
Module (shade one box):
Academic:
 
General Training:
Test Date:
1
D
5
D
   
0
M
6
M
   
2
Y
0
Y
2
Y
2
Y

the issue of euthanasia

the issue of euthanasia gnoG3
When there are different people and regions, when there are different views on the term of life dignity, how can it be a universal value that helps to affirm the dignity of life, and it does not violate the western medicine without hurting people. It is the spirit of doctors. In my opinion, it shows the different explanations of life dignity, so that the issue of euthanasia depends on the Cultural Relativism of the culture, and it presents considerable differences. On the one hand, people who support euthanasia often use the quality requirements of the life of ethicalists, as an excuse to support the legalization of euthanasia. They narrowly view the meaning of the quality of life, and believe that the quality of life is a semantic of life -long. The former focuses on the quality, and the latter focuses on the amount, thinking that people have no right to live, but they have the right to live with quality. In addition, we often hold people with Catholic beliefs and often love life. Even if life is defeated like a ruins, we must do everything that we can protect the life of life comes from the oath; Forbearance, the truth of bitterness, the truth, the trouble, is Bodhi, and the inspiration of the inspiration of the cause of the industry comes from the Buddha's teaching. These people who have supported their perseverance and actual actions to the final breath. In terms of human dignity and personality, such a person is a respectable brave. On the contrary, patients think that long pain is not as short as possible, and active or passive requires those who are directly euthanized by anesthesia injection in the form of anesthesia. It must be lower than those patients with long -term couch beds and barely relying on medical equipment. The value and dignity of life cannot be measured with life length or quality of commodity. On the other hand, a person's ethical decision is based on religious beliefs, or the church teachings as the ethical principles, which will make the judgment criteria of the believer show Fidelism. Therefore, as far as the devotion is concerned, according to the value of loyalty in their hearts, the understanding of the term life dignity often shows different views from atheists or scientists. From the perspective of religious families, the implementation of euthanasia may be the ruthless trample of science and technology, law, and ruthlessness of life dignity. They even think that the legislation and implementation of euthanasia are undoubtedly the behavior of supporting self -hurt life in disguise. Christians may think that the expansion of human scientific and technological capabilities and the infinite expansion of scientificism have gradually caused humans to have an illusion. They believe that people are the master of the world or self. Or death. At this time, people seem to have begun to play God, hiding moral ethics in the social system, and their conscience and responsibility obligations have begun to blur under the guarantee of the legalization system. For Buddhists, the practice of euthanasia is the method of treating the standards and not the root cause. Humanity believes that with the implementation of euthanasia, it can end the pain of patients. It is not known that the current death may be just the beginning of pain. They believe that people should learn to bear it, and to fulfill their lives in their lives and blessed their lives, and to transform their physical and mental karma. If they are eager to euthanasia, they rush to end the physical life, but they will continue to become the cause of the afterlife. In addition to loyalties of religious beliefs to explain the dignity of life, different regions may also change subdivisions due to their different ethical values, customs, or social systems. In summary, from the perspective of medical ethics, a patient who has lost his ability to control life is a burden of society, but the patient is definitely not a person who loses human dignity. In my opinion, family members and medical staff must not only treat them kindly, but also try their best to help patients overcome the pain.
When there are
different
people
and regions, when there are
different
views on the
term
of
life
dignity
, how can it be a universal
value
that
helps
to affirm the
dignity
of
life
, and it does not violate the western medicine without hurting
people
. It is the spirit of doctors. In my opinion, it
shows
the
different
explanations of
life
dignity
,
so
that the issue of euthanasia depends on the Cultural Relativism of the culture, and it presents considerable differences. On the one hand,
people
who
support euthanasia
often
use
the
quality
requirements of the
life
of ethicalists, as an excuse to support the legalization of euthanasia. They
narrowly
view the meaning of the
quality
of
life
, and
believe
that the
quality
of
life
is a semantic of
life
-long. The former focuses on the
quality
, and the latter focuses on the amount, thinking that
people
have no right to
live
,
but
they have the right to
live
with
quality
.
In addition
, we
often
hold
people
with Catholic beliefs and
often
love
life
. Even if
life
is defeated
like a ruins, we
must
do everything that we can protect the
life
of
life
comes
from the oath; Forbearance, the truth of bitterness, the truth, the trouble, is Bodhi, and the inspiration of the inspiration of the cause of the industry
comes
from the Buddha's teaching. These
people
who
have supported their perseverance and actual actions to the final breath. In terms of
human
dignity
and personality, such a person is a respectable brave.
On the contrary
,
patients
think
that long
pain
is not as short as possible, and active or passive requires those
who
are
directly
euthanized by anesthesia injection in the form of anesthesia. It
must
be lower than those
patients
with long
-term
couch beds and
barely
relying on medical equipment. The
value
and
dignity
of
life
cannot
be measured
with
life
length or
quality
of commodity.
On the other hand
, a person's ethical decision
is based
on religious beliefs, or the church teachings as the ethical principles, which will
make
the judgment criteria of the believer
show
Fidelism.
Therefore
, as far as the devotion
is concerned
, according to the
value
of loyalty in their hearts, the understanding of the
term
life
dignity
often
shows
different
views from atheists or scientists. From the perspective of religious families, the implementation of euthanasia may be the ruthless trample of science and technology, law, and ruthlessness of
life
dignity
. They even
think
that the legislation and implementation of euthanasia are
undoubtedly
the behavior of supporting self -hurt
life
in disguise. Christians may
think
that the expansion of
human
scientific and technological capabilities and the infinite expansion of scientificism have
gradually
caused
humans
to have an illusion. They
believe
that
people
are the master of the world or self. Or death. At this time,
people
seem to have begun to play God, hiding moral ethics in the social system, and their conscience and responsibility obligations have begun to blur under the guarantee of the legalization system. For Buddhists, the practice of euthanasia is the method of treating the standards and not the root cause. Humanity
believes
that with the implementation of euthanasia, it can
end
the
pain
of
patients
. It is not known that the
current
death may be
just
the beginning of
pain
. They
believe
that
people
should learn to bear it, and to fulfill their
lives
in their
lives
and blessed their
lives
, and to transform their physical and mental karma. If they are eager to euthanasia, they rush to
end
the physical
life
,
but
they will continue to become the cause of the afterlife.
In addition
to loyalties of religious beliefs to
explain
the
dignity
of
life
,
different
regions may
also
change
subdivisions due to their
different
ethical values, customs, or social systems. In summary, from the perspective of medical ethics, a
patient
who
has lost his ability to control
life
is a burden of society,
but
the
patient
is definitely not a person
who
loses
human
dignity
. In my opinion, family members and medical staff
must
not
only
treat them kindly,
but
also
try their best to
help
patients
overcome the
pain
.
Do not write below this line
Official use only
CC
5.5
LR
5.5
GR
6.5
TA
6.0
OVERALL BAND SCORE
6.0
Barcode 1
Barcode 1

IELTS essay the issue of euthanasia

👍 High Quality Evaluation

Correction made by newly developed AI

✅ Check your Writing

Paste/write text, get result

⭐ Writing Ideas

Free for everyone

⚡ Comprehensive report

Analysis of your text

⌛ Instant feedback

Get report in less than a second

Copy promo code:vjRA5
Copy
Recent posts