The burning of oil for transport especially in private cars is wasteful and environmentally irresponsible. Taxation on petrol and diesel fuel should be increased to very high level to discourage the use of private cars. To what extent do you agree or disagree? To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The burning of oil when transport is considered to be utterly disastrous for the environment. Thereof, high tax obligation of both petrol and diesel fuel might reduce the car use. From this moment on, I do agree with such an approach presuming it as an effective tackling of green issues. First of all, exhaust fumes would tremendously shrink provided that fuel rose in price. In this case, people may tend to buy electrical cars which are certainly pollution-free. Nowadays, it is distinctly observed not only in Europe but also in the United States as a result of Russian-oil-embargo situation. A recently conducted research has shown a sharp decline of carbon dioxide in the air within many countries altogether, for increasing taxation could provoke efficient ecological changes. Second of all, oil production being diminished, the environment will recover. Extracting fossil fuel from the bottom of the earth has truly affected the nature, so it is significant for upcoming generations to cease this production as soon as possible. Unfortunately, during the past decades, humanity has appeared to confront various oil disasters and the latest one was in Norilsk. A few years ago, one private company spilt oil right into a siberian river having aggravated ecological situation drastically. In addition, many forest animals perished when drinking contaminated water from the river. Hereby, high levying petrol being implemented, oil production could be decreased, having saved the planet. Finally, I would like to sum up that what could genuinely address green issues is expensive price on fuel.