The best way to help under-achieving pupils is to have compulsory after school activities which they must attend. This way they will become more involved in schools and their grades will improve. To what extent do you agree?

Some people think that the teenagers who has a poor assessment should stay later lessons and attending the following school activities. I cannot agree with this statement due to the fact that it would be a hard for under-achieving pupils and teachers and the second reason is that lids would be lazy for that. To begin with, the classes after main studying process would be redundant activities for all. Teachers and learner already will be tired and this extra classes would not have a positive effect on their physical and mental health. Consequently, their grades will not be improved and more over the situation might be a vice versa. For instance, a stated tiredness can cause burnout, and then pupil has a chance to lose any interested in study. To the other hand, the fact that children already not involved in schools, give a sigh that despite a mandatory extracurricular activities, they will not have a insights and desires for knowledge. The reason for this is teenage maximalism and unwillingness to do something against one's will. So, it could lend to fact that teenagers will simple hate the school. For example, the recent research shows that when learner were forced to study after school, their grades dropped to half as low. For the conclude, I should say that organized the after school events can result in fatigue and burnout for both students and teachers, and moreover, it will not have an any affect because teenagers character and and their attitudes toward learning.