Sugar consumption is too harmful. Some say it is the government's responsibility to limit sugar intake, while others say it is individuals who are responsible. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

It is an irrefutable fact that consumption of sugar has adverse effects on our body. While some concur that it is upto authorities to control the intake of it, others quibble from them and claim that consumers are the main factors who are responsible. The essay will discuss both aspects before offering my position. The supporters of the former view distinguish that those in power are responsible for limiting sugar consumption. The top-notch reason is resources and power. In other words, by one initiative of politicians, legislators have to inform such regulation to control it. However, individuals do not have such sources to disseminate sugar to consumers. Additionally, members of policy makers could levy tariffs to minimize the intake of sugar. As a result, people forcefully have to reduce consumption. Hence, it is clear that political parties can lower the use of sugar. On the other side, proponents of the second notion hold that locals are mature enough to understand the perilous effects of sugar. The rationale which hauls them to patrons is buyers are the key role who control the market not government. If they cease purchasing it, automatically the phenomenon will be managed. Another point worth mentioning is that consumers are responsible for their diet. Since the government cannot force each and everyone to eat a certain type of cuisine, people have to manage their food habits whether they limit the consumption of sugar or not. Thus, consumers are responsible for such a trend. To conclude, I opine that both parties have to make harmony for fruitful outcomes of citizens' health. Although purchasers can control this, authorities should take steps in order to limit intake of sugar.