Some people think that non academic subjects(eg physical education and cookery) should be removed from the syllabus,so that children can concentrate wholly on acadekic subjcets?

Nowadays children are being put a lot of pressure on their studies by their teachers and parents, while they are studying the subjects which they do not need to learn in order to be student in a particular university. In my view, removing that non-academic subjects from pupil's lesson schedule at school would be the first and the best choice for being successful person. Because people can learn more things about their essential subjects instead of studying other unnecessary lessons such as physical education and cookery. They will have more time to learn the subject which are they need. However, there is a second side of this action. Because pupil might be unfamiliar with theee subjects which we are going to remove. They are also necessary, but not for education. We need cookery for cooking and physical education in the aim of being healthy. But the subjects can be taught on weekends by parents or we can do some exercises in the morning every day instead of being taught them two or three times a week at school. Furthermore, it will be more helpful. As a consenquence, they do them more than they used to do at school. It will aid to reduce overweight children around the world. Overall, bupy doing this, pupil can focus on more to their essential subjects. As i mentioned earlier, they can learn the other subjects which are they do not need, later or after entering the university. I strongly agree with this statement and if government do this, it would be more useful for pupils.