Check your IELTS writing task 1 and essay, this is a free correction and evaluation service.
Check IELTS Writing it's free
British CouncilIDPCambridge
IELTS Writing Answer Sheet
Barcode 3
Candidate Name:
Sobirova Gulasal
Center Number:
1
2
3
4
   
Candidate Number:
1
4
3
5
3
Module (shade one box):
Academic:
 
General Training:
Test Date:
2
D
7
D
   
1
M
2
M
   
2
Y
0
Y
2
Y
1
Y

Some people believe that there should be a fixed punishment for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivating of committing it should always be taken account when deciding on the punishment. Discuss both of these views and give your opinion

Some people believe that there should be a fixed punishment for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivating of committing it should always be taken account when deciding on the punishment. Discuss both of these views and give your opinion 2PbA6
it is commonly suggested that criminals should be punished based on the type of crime they commit which have a certain form of penalty. while others think that sentences should be administered according to the nature of violation which might have some motives or driving forces behind it that make offenders break the law. In my viewpoint, both of these views have benefits and drawbacks in the aspect of the legal process system as a whole. First of all, imposing a fixed punishment on the individual category of violation can be beneficial in terms of time saving and effective cost. is because it would expedite the due process reach a verdict quicker which can save time for prosecutors as well as defendants, it can reduce the expense occurring during the trials especially the paying for attorneys who has a significant role in legal consequence. The key reason is there is a standard of the criminal sentencing guideline. Despite administering a certain penalty have convenience for two parties, in some cases, it should be ineffective for the offender as well as prosecutor which can lead to unjust convict, considering the individual circumstance of misdeed and finding out the truth would be fairer for both of them, it will give the opportunity for the defendant to prove them self even if it has been substantiated that they truly meant to break the law. It should be taken account into extenuating offence under the condition of wrongdoing, in the case of the murder crime, the suspect might take that action in order to protect him or herself or it probably some caused behind it. Another example is the car accident which can get people to injure or pass away. Some situation, it could occur from the malfunction of engines. In conclusion, even though having the instant of sentence can bring advantageous for two parties in an aspect of time-consuming and reducing the legal fee. From my perspective on issue, the legal process should be factored in each case of crime in order to provide more justice for both of them due to the fact that there are many prisoners who received unjustly verdict.
it
is
commonly
suggested that criminals should
be punished
based on the type of crime they commit which have a certain form of penalty.
while
others
think
that sentences should
be administered
according to the nature of violation which might have
some
motives or driving forces behind it that
make
offenders break the law. In my viewpoint, both of these views have benefits and drawbacks in the aspect of the
legal
process system as a whole.
First of all
, imposing a
fixed
punishment on the individual category of violation can be beneficial in terms of time saving and effective cost.
is
because
it would expedite the due process reach a verdict quicker which can save time for prosecutors
as well
as defendants, it can
reduce
the expense occurring during the trials
especially
the paying for attorneys who
has
a significant role in
legal
consequence. The key reason is there is a standard of the criminal sentencing guideline. Despite administering a certain penalty have convenience for two parties, in
some
cases, it should be ineffective for the offender
as well
as prosecutor which can lead to unjust convict, considering the individual circumstance of misdeed and finding out the truth would be fairer for both of them, it will give the opportunity for the defendant to prove them self even if it has
been substantiated
that they
truly
meant to break the law. It should
be taken
account into extenuating
offence
under the condition of wrongdoing, in the case of the murder crime, the suspect might take that action in order to protect him or herself or it
probably
some
caused behind it. Another example is the car accident which can
get
people
to injure or pass away.
Some
situation, it could occur from the malfunction of engines.
In conclusion
,
even though
having the instant of sentence can bring advantageous for two parties in an aspect of time-consuming and reducing the
legal
fee. From my perspective on issue, the
legal
process should
be factored
in each case of crime in order to provide more justice for both of them due to the fact that there are
many
prisoners who received
unjustly
verdict.
Do not write below this line
Official use only
CC
5.5
LR
6.0
GR
6.5
TA
5.0
OVERALL BAND SCORE
6.0
Barcode 1
Barcode 1

IELTS essay Some people believe that there should be a fixed punishment for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivating of committing it should always be taken account when deciding on the punishment. Discuss both of these views and give your opinion

👍 High Quality Evaluation

Correction made by newly developed AI

✅ Check your Writing

Paste/write text, get result

⭐ Writing Ideas

Free for everyone

⚡ Comprehensive report

Analysis of your text

⌛ Instant feedback

Get report in less than a second

Copy promo code:9g6rD
Copy
Recent posts