Some people think governments should spend money on faster means of public transport. However, others think money should be spent on other priorities (such as the environment). Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

A group of people argue that states ought to dedicate budget on quick public transportation whereas, another group think that there are other important things which they should be considered first. Both viewpoints are equally valid and important and there is no contradiction between these two and statesmen are able to handle both of them. To begin with, as technology growth everything has been changed including public transportation which means people expect that to arrive sooner where they want to go so that faster public transportation is vitally important and it cannot be ignored due to if people do not waste their time on urban trips, they will have more time to deal with some useful things for instance, socializing with friends and families, learning new things, reading a good book, and so on. Moreover, some ideas such as Hyperloop which not only is fast but also can help our planet because it uses solar power and it is the fastest train in the world also there will not be air pollution and noise pollution which is crucial in today’s world. However, another things such as spending money on social health, social welfare, elderly people, and all the human rights are vital which all the ministers can deal with their own duty to make a happy society and better country for people who live there. As a conclusion, ameliorating quality of public transportation does not mean which don not deem other parts due to there are numbers of ministers who can deal with own tasks beside, improving public transport.