Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that, in today's world, subjects like Science and Technology are more important than History. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that, in today's world, subjects like Science and Technology are more important than History. ygRXP
There is no doubt that all the lessons we gain from school are important. Although some people believe that one can be more important and essential than the other one, such as the conflict between history and science-related subjects. In this essay, I will discuss both sides of the argument and explain my support for the former view.
On the one hand, those who believe science and technology classes are more vital might argue that it can be better to prepare students for the upcoming future. This is because the technological era that we live in might want us to be open to the new techs and lifestyles according to the changes. for example, students become more equipped about future technology because of the scientific knowledge which they gain from schools. In contrast, if there be fewer of historical classes the hours of these subjects can be replaced by science lessons and that leads to raising students more equipped with technology knowledge
On the other hand, my view is that history is a general knowledge which must be known by everyone. The reason for this is that the past can lead to the future and it helps young minds to draw their future. For instance, when we look at historical events we can see repetition, and knowing this cycle helps us to understand today and the future. I believe scientists get their inspiration from past errors. If school systems give enough interest to history, students will become wiser and determined about their future.
In conclusion, despite the fact that science and technology knowledge teaches students about upcoming events, my firm belief is that students who learnt from the past are more vital for our future.
There is no doubt that all the lessons we gain from school are
important
. Although
some
people
believe that one can be more
important
and essential than the other one, such as the conflict between history and science-related subjects. In this essay, I will discuss both sides of the argument and
explain
my support for the former view.
On the one hand, those who believe science and
technology
classes are more vital might argue that it can be better to prepare
students
for the upcoming
future
. This is
because
the technological era that we
live
in might want us to be open to the new techs and lifestyles according to the
changes
.
for
example,
students
become more equipped about
future
technology
because
of the scientific knowledge which they gain from schools.
In contrast
, if there be fewer of historical classes the hours of these subjects can
be replaced
by science lessons and that leads to raising
students
more equipped with
technology
knowledge
On the other hand
, my view is that history is a general knowledge which
must
be known
by everyone.
The reason for this is
that the past can lead to the
future
and it
helps
young minds to draw their
future
.
For instance
, when we look at historical
events
we can
see
repetition, and knowing this cycle
helps
us to understand
today
and the
future
. I believe scientists
get
their inspiration from past errors. If school systems give
enough
interest to history,
students
will become wiser and determined about their future.
In conclusion
, despite the fact that science and
technology
knowledge teaches
students
about upcoming
events
, my firm belief is that
students
who
learnt
from the past are more vital for our
future
.
Do not write below this line