Check your IELTS writing task 1 and essay, this is a free correction and evaluation service.
Check IELTS Writing it's free
British CouncilIDPCambridge
IELTS Writing Answer Sheet
Barcode 3
Candidate Name:
tarunsharma_ca
Center Number:
1
2
3
4
   
Candidate Number:
4
6
0
Module (shade one box):
Academic:
 
General Training:
Test Date:
2
D
3
D
   
0
M
7
M
   
2
Y
0
Y
2
Y
3
Y

Some people feel that it is necessary to test new medicines on animals, while other people feel that this is not fair on animals and not necessary. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Some people feel that it is necessary to test new medicines on animals, while other people feel that this is not fair on animals and not necessary. 3EKNX
There is no denying that a plethora of animals are, now, being used as testing subjects in a variety of scopes like research, teaching and exhibition. Some argue that these creatures should be exploited in medicine analysis, while others consider the reverse. Thus, in this following essay, I will look at both perspectives, and depict my own standpoint as well. First of all, it is an undeniable fact that most people would surely reckon that it is better for animals to suffer than for humans to die. All of us would accept the point that new drugs should be tested for side-effect and safety reasons. As a result, scrutinizing the updated medicine on animals is able to ensure it is safe for humans to use, although it does not mean hundred percent. In addition, the majority of masses might opine that utilizing these little organisms would lead to new treatments and save many lives. Contrary to that, obviously, plenty of these poor beasties often die during experiments, inasmuch as they frequently suffer extreme pain. The community who are against animal testing tend to believe the fact that animated beings have rights as well as humans, and these beings' lives also matter, thus the scientists should also respect their lives. Furthermore, these folks always say the benefits from research using animals does not justify the suffering caused. In my point of view, the contradictions from both of these groups could be accepted based on the occasions. Owing to the fact that, heaps of salient medical discoveries_ surgical procedures, insulin, pain relievers, organ transplantation, etc_involved experimentation on little beasties. For that reason, I suppose applying organisms in testing is still necessary, but the number of creatures used could be reduced. If we look at opposing the application of brutes, other alternatives methods, like computer-based modellings(in silico), cell-based test(in vitro), test that tissues taken from human and animal (ex vivo) and so on, could provide more dependable method of studying the effect of drugs. Thus, replacement of traditional creatures models by non-animal systems is also lucrative. To conclude that, there are a bunch of contradictions as regards utility of little pets, but I suppose animal testing should be adapted depending on situations.
There is no denying that a plethora of
animals
are,
now
, being
used
as
testing
subjects in a variety of scopes like research, teaching and exhibition.
Some
argue that these creatures should
be exploited
in medicine analysis, while others consider the reverse.
Thus
, in this following essay, I will look at both perspectives, and depict my
own
standpoint
as well
.
First of all
, it is an undeniable fact that most
people
would
surely
reckon that it is better for
animals
to suffer than for
humans
to
die
. All of us would accept the point that new drugs should be
tested
for
side-effect
and safety reasons.
As a result
, scrutinizing the updated medicine on
animals
is able to ensure it is safe for
humans
to
use
, although it does not mean
hundred
percent.
In addition
, the majority of masses might opine that utilizing these
little
organisms would lead to new treatments and save
many
lives
. Contrary to that,
obviously
,
plenty
of these poor
beasties
often
die
during experiments, inasmuch as they
frequently
suffer extreme pain. The community who are against
animal
testing
tend to believe the fact that animated beings have rights
as well
as
humans
, and these beings'
lives
also
matter,
thus
the scientists should
also
respect their
lives
.
Furthermore
, these folks always say the benefits from research using
animals
does not justify the suffering caused. In my point of view, the contradictions from both of these groups could be
accepted
based on the occasions. Owing to the fact that, heaps of salient medical discoveries_ surgical procedures, insulin, pain relievers, organ transplantation,
etc_involved
experimentation on
little
beasties
. For that reason, I suppose applying organisms in
testing
is
still
necessary,
but
the number of creatures
used
could be
reduced
. If we look at opposing the application of brutes, other alternatives methods, like computer-based
modellings
(in
silico
), cell-based
test
(in vitro),
test
that tissues taken from
human
and
animal
(ex
vivo
) and
so
on, could provide more dependable method of studying the effect of drugs.
Thus
, replacement of traditional creatures models by non-animal systems is
also
lucrative.
To conclude
that, there are a bunch of contradictions as regards utility of
little
pets,
but
I suppose
animal
testing
should
be adapted
depending on situations.
Do not write below this line
Official use only
CC
5.5
LR
5.0
GR
6.5
TA
5.0
OVERALL BAND SCORE
5.5
Barcode 1
Barcode 1

IELTS academic Some people feel that it is necessary to test new medicines on animals, while other people feel that this is not fair on animals and not necessary.

👍 High Quality Evaluation

Correction made by newly developed AI

✅ Check your Writing

Paste/write text, get result

⭐ Writing Ideas

Free for everyone

⚡ Comprehensive report

Analysis of your text

⌛ Instant feedback

Get report in less than a second

Recent posts