Some believe buildings should be built in a way that serves their purpose rather than just look beautiful. Others, however, say buildings should represent art too. Discuss both views and give your own opinion

Meanwhile, a plethora of people think if the buildings construct only for serve any distributed ways, it will be beneficial rather than for their conspicuous appearance. However others says the buildings is part of the art. Personally I agree with this opinion what constructions should serve solely for purposes. We can see this is a plethora of buildings are creating for certain ways more precisely for offices, government buildings and also commercial as well as they have purpose for constructing. As every knows, the political and economic negotiations and demonstrations lead in the government buildings that is they have a purpose for creating. According to the others’ notion, the premises should illustrate art too. It is entirely wrong that is when structure are erecting they absolutely requires the number of things more precisely material as well as work force. Additionally they have also cost in any condition. Hence the spending financial things for beauty especially for art building is look like flew all necessary things into the air. On the other hand, The art has managed to make an impact on buildings especially at the present a plethora of structures have built and designed as the unusual appearance. Indeed these have a tend to attract people for themselves which benefits productively to the system of tourist also for country. Furthermore, like this situations widespread and countries always try to emulate each other with build such buildings. Finally It is popular and people enjoy brag their countries with such constructed edifice in magnificent style. In conclusion, Indeed the both way have place anyway. However the constructing buildings for particularly ways is beneficial and can fill the place of spent resources.