Since money for postgraduate research is limited, some people think financial support from the government should be only provided for scientific research rather than research for useful subjects. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Restricted money from Ministry made a segment of society suggest that it would be better to fund only those who made scientific inquiries rather than for their examination of worthwhile subjects. I totally agree with this opinion and this essay will discuss why it is preferred to devote money to scientific research. To begin with, academic inquiry is one of the vital means that scientific researchers have to display the knowledge reached to obtain information and data of high accuracy and reliability. Due to the fact that a postgraduate degree requires students to work independently and they have to analyze and make a lot of scrutiny by themselves in their field of study, which will be a great nudge for becoming an expert. For instance, my brother had made scrutiny of one stone for his research with cash given from the Government, which made him examine it carefully, identifying its worthwhile components, as a result, it was beneficial for both the expert and Authority. Secondly, academic inquiry enforces to prove their hypothesis, which can ultimately, make a difference in people's lives. Once a postgraduate degree student proposed a hypothesis, it can then be investigated, ending in disclosure. For example, had there not been scrutiny on makeup products or cures, stones, and archeology, there would not have been any discoveries now, which have made a great difference in our life. To conclude, a segment of the community claim that limited bill from authorities ought to be disbursed to researchers. I totally concur with them, as it can show the knowledge postgraduate student attained, as well as can make difference in our lives.