Should children keep pets?
Should children keep pets? pmGV9
Many suggest that children benefit from caring for domestic animals, especially in the current technology-focused world this may make a difference in their social behavior. However, the issue is not entirely straightforward, and few could oppose the idea. This essay will discuss the debate and give a concluding view.
On the one hand, those who support the ownership of pets cite the various benefits the activity can bring to a child, ranging from understanding the need for a nutritious diet to learning about biology and daily routines. For example, food selection and exercise activities contribute to this strand of development, which adds notably to the upbringing. Another argument is the emotional support that children receive from pets, meaning that the child feels more secure and thus more confident.
By contrast, opponents of this view point out that not all children live in a situation where pet keeping is nothing but a luxury. One can spot this in less affluent countries, where the expense of maintaining a pet may be extravagant. In addition, many children live in unstable family conditions due to unemployment or political turbulence. For these families, pets would probably suffer neglect, meaning it would be unfair to have any, or possibly even dangerous. Finally, a point to consider is not all young people want a pet because their interests lie elsewhere. For these youngsters, animal ownership should not be encouraged.
To conclude, it seems advisable that the decision to keep a pet should be based on a child’s interest, ability, and family situation, rather than on a general view that all children should have animals. It could serve the interests of both the children and the pets involved. 
Many
 suggest that 
children
 benefit from caring for domestic animals, 
especially
 in the 
current
 technology-focused world this may 
make
 a difference in their social behavior. 
However
, the issue is not 
entirely
 straightforward, and few could oppose the 
idea
. This essay will discuss the debate and give a concluding view.
On the one hand, those who support the ownership of 
pets
 cite the various benefits the activity can bring to a child, ranging from understanding the need for a nutritious diet to learning about biology and daily routines. 
For example
, food selection and exercise activities contribute to this strand of development, which 
adds
 notably
 to the upbringing. Another argument is the emotional support that 
children
 receive from 
pets
, meaning that the child feels more secure and 
thus
 more confident.
By contrast, opponents of this view point out that not all 
children
 live
 in a situation where pet keeping is nothing 
but
 a luxury. One can spot this in less affluent countries, where the expense of maintaining a pet may be extravagant. 
In addition
, 
many
 children
 live
 in unstable family conditions due to unemployment or political turbulence. For these families, 
pets
 would 
probably
 suffer neglect, meaning it would be unfair to have any, or 
possibly
 even 
dangerous
. 
Finally
, a point to consider is not all young 
people
 want a pet 
because
 their interests lie elsewhere. For these youngsters, animal ownership should not 
be encouraged
.
To conclude
, it seems advisable that the decision to 
keep
 a pet should 
be based
 on a child’s interest, ability, and family situation, 
rather
 than on a general view that all 
children
 should have animals. It could serve the interests of both the 
children
 and the 
pets
 involved. 
Do not write below this line