Ownership of mobile phones has risen dramatically in recent years despite the potentially harmful effects they may have on health and the society. Governments should introduce measures to restrict ownership of mobile phones to those who need them for work. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

In the ultra modern epoch, it is a point of debate that use of technological equipment such as mobile phones has ascended enough that the chronic problems may arise regarding health and on community while authorities are recommended to elucidate the ownership by applying particular solution to those who should regularly use it. Undoubtedly, this notion remains successful in keeping the majority in its favour. The upcoming paragraphs would cast light on my arguments relate to the very conception. I totally accurd with the statement that government should create the alternate key in disclosure of hazardous devices. There are murad reasons in support of my altercation. The most prominent is awareness. In simple words, awaring users about the harms and demerits would definitely overcome our problem. Apart from it, not only to physical appearance, it hampers the whole society to be addictive towards it. To add few more causes, how can one forget about promotion of creativeness by neglecting the sufficient use of hindering objects. To justify the same, there is an epitome of humankind who would drive their own mind instead of finding other materials. Last but not least, the whole nation can be benefited if it would be able to organize the altering methods of working through mobile phones by dignity and also economically. On a final note, I am of the opinion that the state should try to remove obstacles that are faced by workers very often. As there is not any plausible argument against the very phenomenon.