Carbon dioxide (CO2) is a key component of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and scientific research has proved that due to a steady rise in GHG emissions, global temperature has continued to increase. The ‘Paris Agreement’, a legally binding international treaty formed on 12 December 2015 (set into motion on 4 November 2016) at the UN Climate Change Conference (COP21) in Paris, to tackle climate change and its effects, set long-term goals in an effort to –
• guide all nations to substantially reduce global greenhouse gas emissions to limit the global temperature increase in this century to 2 degrees Celsius while pursuing efforts to limit the increase even further to 1. 5 degrees;
• review countries’ commitments every five years, i. e. , member countries would return in five years to either make a new round of or update, their climate commitments known as nationally determined contributions (NDCs);
• provide financial, technical and capacity-building support to developing countries to mitigate climate change, strengthen resilience and enhance abilities to adapt to climate impacts.
At present, 194 parties (193 nations & the European Union) have their signatories on the Agreement. It is also worth noting that the Paris Agreement marks the start of a shift towards net-zero, as it calls for GHG emissions to be reduced by 45% by 2030 and net-zero to be achieved by 2050. Rules for a global carbon market were established at the Glasgow COP26 climate change conference in November 2021, enacting the agreement first laid out at the 2015 Paris Climate Agreement.
Carbon markets are essentially trading systems aimed at fighting climate change, in which ‘carbon credits’ or ‘carbon offsets’ are purchased/sold (1 tradable carbon credit is equal to 1 tonne of CO2). Carbon credits, also referred as carbon allowances, are essentially permits which allow a business/company to emit CO2. For example, if a company buys a carbon credit (typically from the Government) they acquire the permission to generate 1 tonne of CO2 or an equivalent of any other greenhouse gas in the form of emissions. Conversely, when a company successfully removes 1 tonne of CO2 from the atmosphere, they generate a carbon offset. This offset can further be bought by other companies so that they can reduce their own carbon footprint. Carbon revenue in the case of carbon credits flow from companies/businesses to governments/regulators and in the case of carbon offsets, between companies. Even though the terms – carbon credit and carbon offset are often used interchangeably, they cater to different carbon markets.
Adopted at the third Conference of the Parties (COP) to the UNFCCC held in Kyoto, Japan, in December 1997, the Kyoto Protocol committed industrialized country signatories (so-called “Annex I” countries) to collectively reduce their GHG emissions by at least 5. 2 percent below 1990 levels on average over 2008–2012. Annex I countries could fulfil their commitments through domestic actions or the use of three flexibility mechanisms - International Emissions Trading (IET), Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) and Joint Implementation (JI). The amendment adopted in Doha, Qatar, in December 2012 provided a basis for the three Kyoto mechanisms to continue for 2013–2020. The IET, JI and CDM were of significant relevance in the creation of cross-boundary carbon markets.
Note: Annex I and Annex B Countries/Parties are the signatory nations to the Kyoto Protocol that are subject to caps on their emissions of GHGs and committed to reduction targets–countries with developed economies. Annex I refer to the countries identified for reduction in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) while the Annex B is an adjusted list of the countries identified under the more recent Kyoto Protocol. Annex B countries have their reduction targets formally stated.
i. The International Emissions Trading Mechanism, stated in Article 17 of the Kyoto Protocol, grants countries with spare emission units (units that are permitted but not used) the right to sell the excess units to countries that need to reach their emissions target. Parties committed to the protocol have targets of allowed emissions/assigned amounts, which are divided into assigned amount units (AAUs) each equal to one tonne of CO2. The other units which may be transferred under the scheme, each, may be in the form of:
• A Removal Unit (RMU) issued by an Annex I Party on the basis of land use, land-use change and forestry (LULUCF) activities;
• An Emission Reduction Unit (ERU) generated by a joint implementation project under Article 6 of the Protocol.
• A Certified Emission Reduction (CER) generated from a clean development mechanism project activity under Article 12 of the Protocol.
ii. The Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), outlined in Article 12 of the Protocol, permits a developed country with an emission-reduction or emission-limitation commitment under the Protocol to implement an emission-reduction project in developing countries. These projects are worth viable certified emission reduction (CER) credits, each equivalent to 1 tonne of CO2, which can ultimately be considered as taking a step towards meeting the Kyoto target. The final approval for emission-reduction projects is given by the Designated National Authorities after a thorough and public registration and issuance process. CDM is supervised by the Clean Development Mechanism Executive Board, which is subject to any and all inquiry by the countries that consented to signing the Kyoto Protocol.
iii. The Joint Implementation (JI) Mechanism, defined in Article 6 of the Protocol, grants a developed country with an emission-reduction or emission-limitation commitment under the Protocol the liberty to earn emission reduction units (ERUs) from an emission-reduction or emission removal project in another Annex B Party, each equivalent to 1 tonne of CO2. This can be considered as taking a step towards meeting the Kyoto target as well. JI therefore offers countries a highly adaptable and cost-effective means of fulfilling a part of their Kyoto commitments.
Registry systems track and record transactions by Parties under the three Kyoto Protocol mechanisms. The UN Climate Change Secretariat keeps an international transaction log to verify that transactions align with the rules of the Protocol. In addition to this, reporting is done by Parties by submission of annual emission inventories and national reports under the Protocol at routine intervals and a compliance system confirms if Parties are meeting their commitments and helps them to meet their commitments if they have any complications in doing so.
Furthermore, the Adaptation Fund was established under the Protocol to finance adaptation projects and programmes in developing countries that are Parties to the Kyoto Protocol. In the first commitment period, the Fund was financed mainly with a share of proceeds from CDM project activities. In Doha, in 2012, it was decided that for the second commitment period, international emissions trading and joint implementation would also provide the Adaptation Fund with a 2% share of proceeds.
Carbon
dioxide (CO2) is a key component of greenhouse gas (
GHG
)
emissions
and scientific research has proved that due to a steady rise in
GHG
emissions
,
global
temperature has continued to increase. The ‘Paris
Agreement’
, a
legally
binding
international
treaty formed on 12 December 2015 (set into motion on 4 November 2016) at the UN
Climate
Change
Conference (COP21) in Paris, to tackle
climate
change
and its effects, set long-term goals in an effort to
–
• guide all
nations
to
substantially
reduce
global
greenhouse gas
emissions
to limit the
global
temperature increase in this century to 2 degrees Celsius while pursuing efforts to limit the increase even
further
to 1. 5 degrees;
• review
countries’
commitments
every five years,
i. e.
,
member
countries
would return in five years to either
make
a new round of or update, their
climate
commitments
known as
nationally
determined contributions (
NDCs
);
• provide financial, technical and capacity-building support to developing
countries
to mitigate
climate
change
, strengthen resilience and enhance abilities to adapt to
climate
impacts.
At present, 194
parties
(193
nations
& the European Union) have their signatories on the
Agreement
. It is
also
worth noting that the Paris
Agreement
marks the
start
of a shift towards net-zero, as it calls for
GHG
emissions
to be
reduced
by 45% by 2030 and net-zero to
be achieved
by 2050.
Rules
for a
global
carbon
market
were established
at the Glasgow COP26
climate
change
conference in November 2021, enacting the
agreement
first
laid out at the 2015 Paris
Climate
Agreement.
Carbon markets are
essentially
trading
systems aimed at fighting
climate
change
, in which
‘carbon
credits’
or
‘carbon
offsets’
are
purchased
/sold (1 tradable
carbon
credit
is equal to 1 tonne of CO2).
Carbon
credits
,
also
referred as
carbon
allowances, are
essentially
permits which
allow
a business/
company
to emit CO2.
For example
, if a
company
buys
a
carbon
credit
(
typically
from the
Government
) they acquire the permission to generate 1 tonne of CO2 or an equivalent of any other greenhouse gas in the form of
emissions
.
Conversely
, when a
company
successfully
removes 1 tonne of CO2 from the atmosphere, they generate a
carbon
offset
. This
offset
can
further
be
bought
by other
companies
so
that they can
reduce
their
own
carbon
footprint.
Carbon
revenue in the case of
carbon
credits
flow from
companies
/businesses to
governments
/regulators and in the case of
carbon
offsets
, between
companies
.
Even though
the terms
–
carbon
credit
and
carbon
offset
are
often
used
interchangeably
, they cater to
different
carbon
markets.
Adopted at the third Conference of the
Parties
(COP) to the
UNFCCC
held in Kyoto, Japan, in December 1997, the Kyoto
Protocol
committed industrialized
country
signatories (
so
-called
“Annex
I”
countries)
to
collectively
reduce
their
GHG
emissions
by at least 5. 2 percent below 1990 levels on average over 2008–2012.
Annex
I
countries
could fulfil their
commitments
through domestic actions or the
use
of three flexibility
mechanisms
-
International
Emissions
Trading
(
IET
),
Clean
Development
Mechanism
(CDM) and
Joint
Implementation (
JI
). The amendment adopted in Doha, Qatar, in December 2012 provided a basis for the three Kyoto
mechanisms
to continue for 2013–2020. The
IET
,
JI
and CDM were of significant relevance in the creation of cross-boundary
carbon
markets.
Note:
Annex
I and
Annex
B Countries/Parties are the signatory
nations
to the Kyoto
Protocol
that are subject to caps on their
emissions
of
GHGs
and committed to
reduction
targets–countries with developed economies.
Annex
I refer to the
countries
identified for
reduction
in the United
Nations
Framework Convention on
Climate
Change
(
UNFCCC
) while the
Annex
B is an adjusted list of the
countries
identified under the more recent Kyoto
Protocol
.
Annex
B
countries
have their
reduction
targets
formally
stated.
i. The
International
Emissions
Trading
Mechanism
, stated in
Article
17 of the Kyoto
Protocol
, grants
countries
with spare
emission
units
(units
that
are permitted
but
not
used
) the right to sell the excess
units
to
countries
that need to reach their
emissions
target
.
Parties
committed to the
protocol
have
targets
of
allowed
emissions/assigned amounts, which
are divided
into assigned amount
units
(
AAUs
) each equal to one tonne of CO2. The other
units
which may
be transferred
under the scheme, each, may be in the form of:
• A Removal
Unit
(
RMU
) issued by an
Annex
I
Party
on the basis of land
use
, land-
use
change
and forestry (
LULUCF
) activities;
• An
Emission
Reduction
Unit
(
ERU
) generated by a
joint
implementation
project
under
Article
6 of the Protocol.
• A Certified
Emission
Reduction
(CER) generated from a
clean
development
mechanism
project
activity under
Article
12 of the Protocol.
ii. The
Clean
Development
Mechanism
(CDM), outlined in
Article
12 of the
Protocol
, permits a developed
country
with an emission-reduction or emission-limitation
commitment
under the
Protocol
to implement an emission-reduction
project
in developing
countries
. These
projects
are worth viable certified
emission
reduction
(CER)
credits
, each equivalent to 1 tonne of CO2, which can
ultimately
be considered
as taking a step towards meeting the Kyoto
target
. The final approval for emission-reduction
projects
is
given
by the Designated National Authorities after a thorough and public registration and issuance process. CDM
is supervised
by the
Clean
Development
Mechanism
Executive Board, which is subject to any and all inquiry by the
countries
that consented to signing the Kyoto Protocol.
iii. The
Joint
Implementation (
JI
)
Mechanism
, defined in
Article
6 of the
Protocol
, grants a developed
country
with an emission-reduction or emission-limitation
commitment
under the
Protocol
the liberty to earn
emission
reduction
units
(
ERUs
) from an emission-reduction or
emission
removal
project
in another
Annex
B
Party
, each equivalent to 1 tonne of CO2. This can
be considered
as taking a step towards meeting the Kyoto
target
as well
.
JI
therefore
offers
countries
a
highly
adaptable and cost-effective means of fulfilling a part of their Kyoto commitments.
Registry systems
track
and record transactions by
Parties
under the three Kyoto
Protocol
mechanisms
. The UN
Climate
Change
Secretariat
keeps
an
international
transaction log to verify that transactions align with the
rules
of the
Protocol
.
In addition
to this, reporting
is done
by
Parties
by submission of annual
emission
inventories and national reports under the
Protocol
at routine intervals and a compliance system confirms if
Parties
are meeting their
commitments
and
helps
them to
meet
their
commitments
if they have any complications in doing
so
.
Furthermore
, the Adaptation Fund
was established
under the
Protocol
to finance adaptation
projects
and
programmes
in developing
countries
that are
Parties
to the Kyoto
Protocol
. In the
first
commitment
period, the Fund
was financed
mainly
with a share of proceeds from CDM
project
activities. In Doha, in 2012, it
was decided
that for the second
commitment
period,
international
emissions
trading
and
joint
implementation would
also
provide the Adaptation Fund with a 2% share of proceeds.