Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

The topic of some scientist these day are studying to progress a type of new medicines and help test product a safety way is an issue of considerable significance. i accept that use the number of animal from natural to make medicines can have creative a considerable advantage I would argue that the animal testing is morally wrong. Those who are in favour of using animals to make drugs for humanity point to some clear reasons. It is vital to understand that in medical research if organ transplants from pigs to humans, it will bring a modest benefit to save human lives. To illustrate, experiments on pigs face less opposition from the public. The internal organs of pigs are about the same size as humans, so many people hope to be able to transplant organs from pigs to humans. Additionally, They can use animals that are the first subject to test a number of new products before giving out to the public. therefore They limit the risk when people purchase and use various new products. There is, however, room for flexibility in the sense that the use of animals to make medicines will be morally wrong and impact negatively in the future. It is manifestly true that the use of animals that are not control may result in some species becoming extinct. For example, many scientist often use mokey, rabbit, dog for laboratory a large number. so in the long run, if uncontrolled they would lead to a serious threat. One should be mentioned that education could be effective when teaching children about protect animals a right method.