Many people believe that the government should spend money on faster public transport. Others think that money should be spent on different aspects of social transportation such as cost reduction and environmental conservation.

The question of developing public transport has been widely discussed in recent years. A multitude of individuals suppose that the people in power are advised to invest the budget into more rapid social transportation. Others believe that it is a good idea for finance to be dedicated to various features of public transport, for example charge decrease and environment conservation. Personally, I think that this question is a controversial one and is open for debate. The first thing that should be noted is that traveling by fast social transportation like trains could have an effect on time management. It means that people can spend their time on other important things, rather than sitting on buses. For example, meeting with friends or family members, these things are what people do instead of long traveling. Nowadays spending a lot of time in traffic jams and a sedentary lifestyle is a big problem. So another reason why this offer should be done is that using faster transports has a positive effect on people's mental and physical health. Also the government should take note about various aspects of public transports. Today, it is a well-known fact that some public transportation, which uses petrol, has a negative effect on the ecology. Maybe engineers can decide this problem by using alternative things. We clearly see that some countries such as South Korea practice using electricity energy for driving. Another aspect that should be noted is transport ticket price. It will be good if the government gives a chance for members of society to travel for less money on the new comfortable transports. Talking all these points into consideration, I would say that both views are equally important. In summary, I tend to believe that the former/ the latter opinion is more persuasive as it can be not only affordable, but also have a positive impact on the environment.