Is creating art only for some special people?

When it comes to art, some people claim that only chosen individuals can perform art, while some others argues every human being is able to create art. Although that is really a hard dispute to talk about, which requires some explanations on the definition of art itself, I will try to express both approaches in this essay. The ones who think that art is an exclusive area that requires special skills to perform, are basing their idea on the meaning of art itself. The art is so unique to be created by a random person. The individuals who create or perform art have got to be someone talented and has a deep soul to actually feel the tune of the life and able to export it to the world. Even if an "ordinary" person tries to do art, it is not an art because it was not done by a human that deserves to create art with required skills like talent and maybe the wisdom. This kind of conservative view has a lot of followers actually. On the other side of the conflict, things are a bit different. They argue that it is enough to call something "art" if it is done with the purpose of doing art. They think art is maybe a special existing, but it does not need to be created by someone with rare skills to remain its specialty. Through their aspect, art does not find it's meaning by the one who created it; the echoes reflected the universe are its meaning itself. To sum it up, those two opposite arguments will maintain their existence as long as the art is there and any side will not overweigh the other.