Human activity has had a negative effect on plants and animals all over the world. Some people think that it is too late to do something about it. Others think that there is still time to take effective action. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

It is argued by group of people that, it’s too late to prevent environment pollution caused by various human activities while others think that people can still prevent further damage to the nature, if we take an immediate action. In my belief, I think we still have time to protect our natural resources, yet both the views are elaborated in the essay. Firstly, some of the members of the society complaint that the time has passed to take actions related to the environment pollution, due to the fact that, there are some negative reactions arising from nature during the past few decades. Scientists still not be able to find a fruitful solution for the rapid increase rate of global warming and for the impact to the Orson Layer. For instance, according to research that has been taken place in the USA, proved that the warnings have been issued to some islands in Maldives to move their citizens to another area since those lands will disappear as a result of increasing sea levels. On the contrary, majority of the crowd claim that we would be able to overcome this situation if we take urgent steps to prevent the causes of nature corruption. Most of the countries have developed their technology in nature friendly manner. As an example, based on survey that has been taken place in Japan confirmed that 95% of their refrigerators have converted to with inverting facility, which is useful to reduce the CFC exposure. Not only that but also, they have introduced the ‘Green Zones’ concept, to re-build the Ozone layer. In conclusion, I would say that the environment pollution can be reduced if we manage to take necessary arrangements with immediate effect because the same will be beneficial to prevent further damage to the natural resources.