Myanmar and dictatorship problems

This literature will evaluate the current civil war in South East Asia region, specially Myanmar where the unrest between an unrecognized military government versus the former officials come into play. The structure of this essay is firstly, will introduce a summary of this conflict and where it originated. Subsequently, will provide a brief economic growth of Myanmar, which will simultaneously impact the Myanmist perception towards the current government. Continuously, will identify the difference among non-states actors as well as elaborate how it is interrelated to the apparent official bodies in Myanmar. Also, this paper will offer how this paper contributes to the existing ones and conclusion, respectively. On the one hand, it can be widely argued that due to the uncertain circumstances during the past few years, tremendous questions have been raised such as to what extent the current leader of Myanmar can be approved on a global stage. More importantly, have the political and economic climate been affected by this unresolved tension? This essay will focus primarily on non-state actors, their contributions as well as identifying how so called, the Arakan Army (AA) and other insurgent groups namely, the Kachin Independence Army (KIA), the Myanmar National Democratic Alliance Army (MNDAA) and the Ta'ang National Liberation Army (TNLA) systemised in response to the current military authoritarian of Myanmar. To begin with, traced back to the 1990 general election, the victory of the National league of democracy party claimed to be the root of this conflict. This is because of both endogenous, exogenous forces and security problems among minorities in Myanmar. Amidst such conditions, this paved the way for military authoritarianism to dictate the country, which caused anger and boycott from the majority of the citizens.