Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest the money in public, services instead. To that extent do you agree with this statement? v.8
Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest the money in public, services instead. To that extent v. 8 X3ko8
It is often argued that separating budget for art, music and theater is considered as damaging government fund however number of people present that they should focus on public services. I completely disagree with this statement and reasons for this disagreement notion will be discussed in the following essay with relevant examples. First of all, state extracting their budget in artistic creation, rocks and other enjoyment platform, should be considered as the positive development of the nation owing to the fact that it really prevents the tradition and cultural practices in existence and also number of documentation project can also been seen in historical society, which fortunately helps in tourists attractions and may be the source of income. Let's have an example, picture of Janaki temple and drawing really represents the historical evidence that their may be God or any information of human evolution. Therefore, prevention of such monuments can also help to support to enrich the capital of nation. On the other hand, public services also one of the essential point to be mentioned in light of the fact that general pay tax to their state so, suitable environment must be created to them. On the contrary, emphasising more on ordinary needs doesn't provide income to the nation anyway way of earning should not have to be forgotten. For instance, government of Sweden provided numerous facilities to their public which is paid by them as revenue but we can noticed that there is no more tourists attractions places. Hence, only providing comfortable suitation to the general will not be efficient despite of this there also may have several creational works from which money can be earned. To conclude, extracting amount of budget on art, rocks and bar will be more beneficial factor however public requirements also be involved on their schedule but more money have to invest on the way of generating more and more tax.
It is
often
argued that separating budget for art, music and theater
is considered
as damaging
government
fund
however
number of
people
present that they should focus on
public
services. I completely disagree with this statement and reasons for this disagreement notion will
be discussed
in the following essay with relevant examples.
First of all
, state extracting their budget in artistic creation, rocks and other enjoyment platform, should
be considered
as the
positive
development of the nation owing to the fact that it
really
prevents
the tradition and cultural practices in existence and
also
number of documentation project can
also
been
seen
in historical society, which
fortunately
helps
in tourists attractions and may be the source of income.
Let
's have an example, picture of
Janaki
temple and drawing
really
represents the historical evidence that their may be God or any information of human evolution.
Therefore
, prevention of such monuments can
also
help
to support to enrich the capital of nation.
On the other hand
,
public
services
also
one of the essential point to
be mentioned
in light of the fact that general pay tax to their state
so
, suitable environment
must
be created
to them.
On the contrary
,
emphasising
more on ordinary needs doesn't provide income to the nation anyway way of earning should not
have to
be forgotten
.
For instance
,
government
of Sweden provided numerous facilities to their
public
which
is paid
by them as revenue
but
we can
noticed
that there is no more tourists attractions places.
Hence
,
only
providing comfortable
suitation
to the general will not be efficient
despite of
this there
also
may have several
creational
works from which money can
be earned
.
To conclude
, extracting amount of budget on art, rocks and bar will be more beneficial factor
however
public
requirements
also
be involved
on their schedule
but
more money
have to
invest on the way of generating more and more tax.
Do not write below this line