Check your IELTS writing task 1 and essay, this is a free correction and evaluation service.
Check IELTS Writing it's free
British CouncilIDPCambridge
IELTS Writing Answer Sheet
Barcode 3
Candidate Name:
tursunboy112233
Center Number:
1
2
3
4
   
Candidate Number:
1
5
5
5
5
Module (shade one box):
Academic:
 
General Training:
Test Date:
0
D
9
D
   
0
M
1
M
   
2
Y
0
Y
2
Y
2
Y

democracy is not necessary to bring development

democracy is not necessary to bring development pbB7D
Democracy is not necessary to bring development The world's largest system of governing ended it is journey when WW1 broke. Obviously it was clear to get a new system to compensate the monarchy system and European countries renewed a former system of governing used by the Greek civilization and called "democracy". "Demo" means people and "Cracy" means government. But this structure does not bring the hope that people were having towards it. Therefore why democracy is not important to bring development? First of all, it allows interest in bank which has a huge impact on the building of society. Primarily, it does not balance the community and it just increases the rich richness and the poor poorness. After all, it lead hatred among the people for wherever it exists and interrupted the stability and coexistence as it happened in Sudan. In Jan 2018 the demonstration of employers in Sudan caused the death of 12 people. Furthermore, it makes rich people to be selfish and consider only their source of income not about the people. In addition, the recurrent alteration of leaders in country creates instability and segregation among them. In the first place, the political parties encouraged a break in the society in which the people in the same house will support different leaders. Additionally, each new elected nominated responsible tries when he/she comes to seat to do everything on their own way, even, if it costs to withdraw the former responsible achievements. For instance, if he/she comes to ministry of education they will try to change the syllabus. At the same time, this system contributes corruption in many ways. First, it does not have strong criteria’s when choosing the people linking with their personal values such as honest and sincerity. It will be enough if you have just some justification of degrees and masters to get that seat. Similarly, the large number of government departments led many people to lost money. We could say that the biggest factor that makes the corruption to occur is due to the week institutions and since no one is asked about their action. In conclusion, democracy cannot go with the development of countries since it does not satisfy its requirements. This system allows the interest which is injustice to the poor people. Also, it supports the multiple political parties and contributes corruption indirectly.
Democracy
is not necessary to bring development The world's largest
system
of governing ended it is journey when WW1 broke.
Obviously
it was
clear
to
get
a new
system
to compensate the monarchy
system
and European countries renewed a former
system
of governing
used
by the Greek civilization and called
"
democracy
"
.
"
Demo
"
means
people
and
"
Cracy
"
means
government
.
But
this structure
does
not bring the hope that
people
were having towards it.
Therefore
why
democracy
is not
important
to bring development?
First of all
, it
allows
interest in bank which has a huge impact on the building of society.
Primarily
, it
does
not balance the community and it
just
increases the rich richness and the poor poorness.
After all
, it
lead
hatred among the
people
for wherever it exists and interrupted the stability and coexistence as it happened in Sudan. In Jan 2018 the demonstration of employers in Sudan caused the death of 12
people
.
Furthermore
, it
makes
rich
people
to be selfish and consider
only
their source of income not about the
people
.
In addition
, the recurrent alteration of leaders in country creates instability and segregation among them. In the
first
place, the political parties encouraged a break in the society in which the
people
in the same
house
will support
different
leaders.
Additionally
, each new elected nominated responsible tries when he/she
comes
to seat to do everything on their
own
way, even, if it costs to withdraw the former responsible achievements.
For instance
, if he/she
comes
to ministry of education they will try to
change
the syllabus. At the same time, this
system
contributes corruption in
many
ways.
First
, it
does
not have strong criteria’s when choosing the
people
linking with their personal values such as honest and sincerity. It will be
enough
if you have
just
some
justification of degrees and masters to
get
that seat.
Similarly
, the large number of
government
departments led
many
people
to lost money. We could say that the biggest factor that
makes
the corruption to occur is due to the week institutions and since no one
is asked
about their action.
In conclusion
,
democracy
cannot
go with
the development of countries since it
does
not satisfy its requirements. This
system
allows
the interest which is injustice to the poor
people
.
Also
, it supports the multiple political parties and contributes corruption
indirectly
.
Do not write below this line
Official use only
CC
6.5
LR
5.5
GR
6.0
TA
6.0
OVERALL BAND SCORE
6.0
Barcode 1
Barcode 1

IELTS essay democracy is not necessary to bring development

👍 High Quality Evaluation

Correction made by newly developed AI

✅ Check your Writing

Paste/write text, get result

⭐ Writing Ideas

Free for everyone

⚡ Comprehensive report

Analysis of your text

⌛ Instant feedback

Get report in less than a second

Recent posts