Creative artists should be given the freedom to express their ideas （through words, pictures, music or films）.However, some people think government should impose certain restrictions on them. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Wheather artists should be given the freedom to creat their work is a frequent agued and sometime polorized issue. In my oppion, I believe that by allowing this freedom for every art worker in the world we will have better arts and societies. Imposing restrictions on artists is both unnecessary and unpractical. Firstly, public and art comsummers have their appetise to disdinguish good arts from the bad. Secondly, there are already laws and regulations to cope with potentially coursed issue by art production. For example, if authortities have concerns about pornographic or violent product be published under the name of art, then they will find that with the legislation in publication they are more than empowered. Finally, even if this restriction is needed, they are too complicaed to imply in a complex world, no mention the unlimited dimentions of art. However, allowing artists to work freely will benifit them, art and society. When artist have the freedom to express their ideals, their potencial can be fully stimulated. For example, a female film director who was never allowed to produce movie in her mother country, lunched her art career and won seris of awards after moved to Europ. With stimulated potencial, artists can creat more and better art works, Which in turn will benifet the whole society. In conclusion, my view is that governments should give artists the freedom to express themselve, which can bring numerous benifits to all the art community and society.