community could not operate well if people are unrestricted.do u agree to the given statement?
community could not operate well if people are unrestricted. do u agree to the given statement? jlL
In our society all the individuals or group of people have to perform their routine work, duty, task or any activity without any confusion, danger and with perfection, safe and helpful to others community follows distinct restrictions and regulations. community could not operate well if people are unrestricted. I conquer to the given statement partially
To commence with the view, rules are made to avoid condone of violence to weaker sections. allowing everyone to make changes to these structures and inflict their beliefs on others will lead to violence. for example, in India SC or ST (secluded cast and secluded tribe) people have more employment opportunities. These ideas will make a better life for suppressed groups. Consecutively, rules are properly set and followed minor groups will recognize a peaceful environment.
On the other hand, some of these rules are needed to be rewritten in other words individuals should be allowed to act on what they found acceptable. for instance, my neighbour believed one should only marry from same religion. IN contrary, his son married from a different religion. There was complete pandemonium and everyone was panicked. Hence, Such act will only make people petrified in making individual decisions.
In conclusion, some of the policies are agreeable and needed to be followed. Also environment is dynamic, therefore individuals should be allowed to improve and make new statements if they wont harm anyone. In my opinion I partially agree and partially disagree that individuals should comply with all regulations of community.
In our society all the
individuals
or group of
people
have to
perform their routine work, duty, task or any activity without any confusion,
danger
and with perfection, safe and helpful to others community follows distinct restrictions and regulations.
community
could not operate well if
people
are unrestricted
. I conquer to the
given
statement
partially
To commence with the view,
rules
are made
to avoid condone of violence to weaker sections.
allowing
everyone to
make
changes
to these structures and inflict their beliefs on others will lead to violence.
for
example, in India SC or ST (secluded cast and secluded tribe)
people
have more employment opportunities. These
ideas
will
make
a better life for suppressed groups.
Consecutively
,
rules
are
properly
set and followed minor groups will recognize a peaceful environment.
On the
other
hand,
some
of these
rules
are needed
to be rewritten in
other
words
individuals
should be
allowed
to act on what they found acceptable.
for
instance, my
neighbour
believed one should
only
marry from same religion. IN contrary, his son married from a
different
religion. There was complete pandemonium and everyone
was panicked
.
Hence
, Such act will
only
make
people
petrified in making
individual
decisions.
In conclusion
,
some of the
policies are agreeable and needed to
be followed
.
Also
environment is dynamic,
therefore
individuals
should be
allowed
to
improve
and
make
new statements if they
wont
harm anyone. In my opinion I
partially
agree
and
partially
disagree that
individuals
should comply with all regulations of community.
Do not write below this line