Bringing in foreign workers to fill positions that domestic workers are unwilling to do can cause problems in the local community and should therefore be stopped. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Employing workers from abroad for the posts that are abandoned by local people can have the adverse effects on natives, whereas others firmly have another point of view, as they believe such employment will results in benifits. This essay will delve into both perspectives in order to reach the most appropriate one. On one hand salaries of workers hired from another country are less than the domestic ones, beside having more willingness and enthusiasm for the provided opportunity. Moreover they had proved in representing their capabilities for the above mentioned detail by getting incentives and increments for the given tasks. For example, it has been noticed in news that the maximum posts filled for job vacancy in multinational companies is by the candidates from all over the world and complies may choose the appropriate one with a lower wage. Thus maximum optimization and least salaries are preferred by the employers. Nevertheless, another group of people holds and opposite principle, and has their own reasons. Local workers have the skills to do any kind of job, all what they need is appreciation in addition they can be trusted more than the foreigners. For instance, the famous magazine "Forbes" has surveyed that spirits of leading a country to its heights has only been seen in the natives rather than the aliens. Thus boosting own citizens is the best way for getting the work to be done without hurting the spirits of nationalism. To summarise, although both views seem convincing, as each one of them has its own logic rationale. Yet, I totally agree with the last opinion that favour the employment for local public despite the other ones.