Zoos are a great source recreation.

Some concerned Groups debate that artificial zoos have no significance in this century while others opine it a Supreme entertaining place. However, i would argue that zoos should be banned due to it’s unjustified dealing with animals. Zoos, without doubt, provide education and entertainment, but it is not permissible to run zoos. It is evident that both juveniles and adults enjoy spending their time in zoos by seeing majestic animals such as tigers, lions, cobras from a closer view. After all, not everybody can go on an African safari to see these species. But this is hardly justification for keeping animals in captivity. Man has no right to turn proud beasts into scavengers. Wild animals thrive in wilderness, so any attempt to eliminate them from their inherent territory for keeping human visitors entertained is unlawful. Instead of constructing zoos, the government should pay special attention to develop wild lofe sanctuaries and natural parks. The pupils interested in seeing animals can go on guided jungle safaris. For instance, after seeing a lion or tiger, the exhilaration that one experiences beyond explaining in words, by contrast zoos do not provide that kind of excitement or adrenaline rush. Zoos do not benefit endangered animals anymore. Certainly, those who believe that zoos are required to protect rare animals and other mammals; however, i don't think that this argument holds water. one of the clear example is that African wild animals cannot survive in zoos of Asia due to adverse cllimatic and ecosystem challenges. To sum up, I certainly would agree with the view that Zoos should be closed. Despite they provide some arrangements for visitors entertained, however it is not advisable to turn brutal and comfine animals in small enclosures.